Recent Blog Articles
Sugar: How sweet it is... or is it?
Cardiovascular safety from prostate cancer drugs remains uncertain
Rising alcohol use among older adults
Easily distracted? Try meditation
Harvard Health Ad Watch: Can a wearable device reduce stress?
Listening to your hunger cues
Does your child need to bathe every day?
Can flavonoids help fend off forgetfulness?
Can physical or cognitive activity prevent dementia?
Wondering how much your medical care will cost? New rules could help
Heart Health
Diastolic blood pressure: Worth a second look?
- By Julie Corliss, Executive Editor, Harvard Heart Letter
Recent findings point to possible harm from very low diastolic blood pressure, the second number in a blood pressure reading.
Current blood pressure guidelines define an ideal reading as less than 120/80 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). According to some research, an even lower systolic value (the first number in the reading) may help prevent even more heart attacks and strokes. But more aggressive treatment to lower systolic blood pressure makes sense only as long as you don’t develop symptoms such as feeling lightheaded or dizzy.
However, when it comes to diastolic pressure (the second number in the reading), lower is not necessarily better. A study published the Feb. 1, 2021, in JAMA Network Open found that a very low diastolic blood pressure — less than 60 mm Hg — was linked to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke in people at high cardiovascular risk.
To continue reading this article, you must log in.
Subscribe to Harvard Health Online for immediate access to health news and information from Harvard Medical School.
- Research health conditions
- Check your symptoms
- Prepare for a doctor's visit or test
- Find the best treatments and procedures for you
- Explore options for better nutrition and exercise
I'd like to receive access to Harvard Health Online for only $4.99 a month.
Sign Me UpAlready a member? Login ».
Disclaimer:
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
