Recent Blog Articles
Vegan and paleo: Pluses and minuses to watch
Postpartum anxiety is invisible, but common and treatable
Right-sizing opioid prescriptions after surgery
Ready for your routine medical checkup?
Nicotine addiction explained — and how medications can help
Is your vision impaired? Tips to cope
Misgendering: What it is and why it matters
Healthy brain, healthier heart?
Stories connect us
Wondering about a headline-grabbing drug? Read on
Alternative therapies for cancer
Robert H. Shmerling, MD,
Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
The article raises points and much of the latest science in adding other disciplines to enhance outcomes is often found in complementary or alternative medicine and only now being adopted by conventional to some degree as the science is being done. For example vit c has been shown to decrease the side-affects of chemo and exercise is important to chemo therapy and actually makes chemo more
effective, diet or nutrition science must play a role in recovery, stress or anxiety increases cortisol which in turn suppresses immune function. These things are already adopted by complementary medicine but only now being looked at by conventional. The ability to afford to do the science is a challenge for complementary but i do not see it as necessary as for conventional to do it for the following reason. Complementary are already available to public consumption and have existed often for hundred’s of years. Conventional are yet to exist and so must undergo science testing so as to become publicly available. Science testing is a prerequisite for new drugs otherwise they can not become publicly available. In the absence of the need to do science to become publicly available complementary can only be realistically compared statistically with conventional in treating a diagnosed condition. Food for thought.
I’ve found research to support Vit C infusions to improve immune system during chemo. I’ve found other research Indicating Vit C lessens the impact of a chemo drug called Oxaliplatin so shouldn’t be combined. I’ve found other research that Vit C infusion is most helpful together with Vit K. Does anyone have any clarification for me on this topic for metastasized colon cancer? Thank you.
I do not know the answer but since you are looking on-line I would look for an MD who has experience with both sides complementary and conventional and has an evidence based approach and is up to date. There are many health websites but one particular one stands out to me is a website called hope4cancer and I understand that they are very much into evidence based science and will use both complementary and conventional. They may know more to help you.
In the 1980’S there were a number of articles promoting the possible benefits of a plant based macrobiotic diet to treat cancer. The founder of macrobiotic was Michio Kushi. In Boston where we lived was the East West Centre and they had doctors who had trained with Kushi to deliver nutrition advice.
When my father was diagnosed with advanced stage multiple myeloma the first thing he did was connect with an excellent oncologist at Mass General. Then my mother convinced him to speak with someone at the Kushi Institute. The consultant explained they could help support traditional medical treatment and it did not have to be an “either or” situation.
My father survived 3 years longer than expected, and his oncologist felt it was in part due to his change in diet.
Hi, Derek and Azure: Thank you for your comments. Here’s my “prominent clarification”: Length of life is not the only measure of the success of treatment; quality of life is extremely important – that’s why I made a point of commenting on quality of life in the post above: “Different results might have been observed if other outcomes of interest (such as quality of life) had been included”.
I commented on no fewer than 6 weaknesses of this study; I have no agenda regarding this study or reason to spin the findings.
Dr Ronald Raymond Rife – Sound Frequency healing ???
Didn’t live as long, but how did the quality of life they enjoyed (or didn’t enjoy) compare to those who chose “conventional” therapies?
A few friends have decline chemo, et al, because of their particular cancer diagnosis, because they didn’t believe the chemo et al would work (i.e, clear the cancer) and chose to enjoy what time they had left without all the damage that chemo & radiation can cause. Usually they were in their 70’s.
While chemo & radiation seems to have improved a bit, in terms of less damage to healthy tissue, nervous system, etc., (20 yeas ago, I met women who’d been disabled by chemo-because of the tissue & muscle damage plus chronic pain from chemo & radiation. some people have lasting damage/physical & mental impairments from treatment—and one of my friends was told that the surgeon had “gotten everything” (breast cancer) underwent all the post surgical recommended treatments, yet her cancer has returned & spread. She has long term damage from her treatment and is currently using other medication to (perhaps) lengthen her life, while dealing w/significant side effects.
Perhaps MDs needs to consider those issues too.
Azure, you took the words – and called attention to the sin of omission in this Harvard Letter reporting and the study itself, which is, frankly, unconscionable, suggesting an editorial spin in support of a conventional-therapy agenda. I’m disappointed in Harvard not so much as mentioning the flaw here. A prominent clarification if not outright correction and apology is in order. It’s a matter of trust.
Commenting has been closed for this post.
You might also be interested in…
Life After Cancer
This Special Health Report is designed to guide you through the next stage of your cancer journey. It will walk you through many of the issues you’ll face in the upcoming months and years—the long-term and late effects of your cancer and treatment; the potential for a recurrence or new cancer; the emotional, occupational, and financial issues you’ll potentially face; and the implications for your family and friends. You’ll learn how to readjust to the life you may have put on hold during your treatment, transitioning back to your full work and home life. And you’ll learn ways to maintain your health to prevent new problems, including cancer, from taking hold again.