Recent Blog Articles

Harvard Health Blog

The Supreme Court’s health care decision: What it does—and does not—mean

June 28, 2012


As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.


August 14, 2012

It is pretty bad when you put off going to the doctor because you know that it could put you in bankruptcy but you give in because you are very sick,then get stuck with the bill and then you can’t get your medicine from the pharmacy because it cost two weeks pay and it’s feed your family or get your prescriptions! Family and food comes first. So we get sicker. Great medical care this country has isn’t.People with money are the only ones that matter. Someone from the government should spend some time sitting in a pharmacy for a hour or so. People are told all day long they can not get the medicine they need and walking out enraged. Not to good for a world power.

Therese Nelson
July 11, 2012

Thank you for a well-written and helpful explanation of the health care law. I am personally very happy that an estimated 30 million more people in America will soon be able to have health insurance. It’s also important to stop free-riding, which costs us all. Having had health insurance throughout my life, I know how important it truly is. When my husband got cancer, I don’t know what we would have done without it. Of course, we could have tried going to the emergency room, but he needed sustained care over a period of months, and emergency rooms aren’t equipped to provide that. We would surely have been bankrupted.

As my children become too old to remain on my insurance, I am glad that they–who all have preexisting conditions–will be able to get health insurance no matter what happens with their jobs. It is also fantastic that insurance companies can no longer drop people who get sick. What kind of insurance is that? And why would we want to repeal such a protective provision?

As a woman I also appreciate that the insurance companies can no longer discriminate in their rates against women. There is mush else to admire in this bill, although of course much could be improved. It would be nice to see Republicans and Democrats working TOGETHER in Congress for improvements.

As you mention, it’s not a sure thing yet, because a new Congress in the fall could wipe it all away and put nothing in its place, which would be a sad step backward. I hear vague rumblings about “other options,” but I’ve not heard what the other options are. I would be very interested to hear the specifics of the Republican plan for covering 30 million of our fellow citizens if they, as they promise to do, repeal the Affordable Care Act. I have read widely and haven’t found a single concrete Republican plan that might actually be able to be enacted as a law. If you know of one (specifics please), I would like to learn about it.

Great job explaining the law.

mary d
July 09, 2012

But We American Citizens continue to pay for all the Illegals health care and school – and that sucks!

Larry Rehbaum
July 07, 2012

Dr. Kamaroff, are you a member of the American Medical Association?

Medicare Supplement
July 06, 2012

Does it have any effect on Medicare Supplemental Insurance?

Sonia Conly
July 03, 2012

The comments below generally do not seem to address the fundemental question: Should American citizens of all ages have access to roughly the same level of health security that elderly citizens do? If one believes that this is the case then the “Act” goes a long way toward achieveing that. There is a diversity of systems in other industrialized countries and the citizens of most of those countries seem to find the system in their own country satisfactory. While the US probably leads in inovative treatment it lags in delivering care for many groups and as I senior myself in my view unfairly redistributes income from the young to the old. The Act is second or third best for a lot of people with varying views of first best.

Eugene Buglewicz
July 03, 2012

The Obamatax imposes the HIGHEST TAX BURDEN EVER IMPOSED ON THE MIDDLE CLASS in the history of this Country. This is the first step to a single-payer system (the Government) as expressed by President Obama to the SEIU several years ago. One needs only look at the bureaucratic systems, numbers and types of taxes and exceptions granted by the Administration to organizations being required to be serviced by Obamatax (note, the Unions are exempt!!). One need only look at the current government operations that serve the public: AMTRAC; Post Office; Social Security; Medicare and there are others. These are ALL inefficient and BROKE. Obamatax will result in rationing of medical care – yes, you can see a Dr., but your appointment is in 6 weeks. Your life-saving surgery will have to enter the waiting list for those with higher priorities. Check with Canadian physicians as to why they have fled to the U.S. to avoid this type of disaster. If you are elderly, you must meet the requirements for the “Quality Adjusted Life Year”, an insidious way to ration health care, to see if you will receive treatment or simply a “happy pill” to take you through to the end of your life. We out here in the hinter land call these the “Death Panels”. (Remember what Obama told the lady who asked about her mother needing a pace maker, but was 86? Obama said her mother would not qualify but be made comfortable for the rest of her life.) The pill is a cheaper way to treat your illness even though it will decrease your years. Yes, health insurance, and life, will become cheaper under the Obamatax. It is a blight on us as an American Society. I am disgusted by those in our Federal Government who have imposed this unjust and immoral burden on its citizens. No politician is admitting they voted for this Law. Why? It is probably the worst piece of legislation EVER passed by the Government. Obamatax must be overturned, and other options enacted to cover the “20 million” who are not served by insurance.

July 02, 2012

You know I always tried to give the other person a fair shake but now you make a statement like the one below

These people lived an automobile accident, a heart attack, or a stroke away from becoming destitute.

I have to tell you that I think you all up there on the hill are so full of shit to make a statement like that. Thousand of dollars I have spend trying to get a law sue settle with an insurance company for 8 plus years now. And you tell me you worried about those who are a auto, heart or stoke away from destitute. Even if everyone has health ins. They don’t pay the whole bill anyways and your left with a mountain of bills anyways. So this is just another way you get rich and we pay the bill. How about me I am a paycheck from being out on my ass and living in the street. But that’s ok as long as I pay for the health care cause if I don’t I get fined and that ok cause you don’t have to worry about that now do you.

lilian Brown
July 01, 2012

I am respectfully disagreed in some aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision.

The mandatory health care will be a negative on our economy and to the citizens of the USA. Insurance is a profit gain and not a loss net for the company or anyone who is in the insurance career. It is about Greed, Money and Profit.

Look at the Whole Health Care Reform. Let me tell you, there are a lot more parts that will be affecting everyone and their assets. Health Care Reform is only a quarter of the master plan. Everyone is distracted by the Health Care and not reading the rest to it.

Health Care Insurance through the government is about Profit, Greed and Self-profit as well as elimination of citizens from the population.

People do not have employment and they will be charging them penalties for not carrying health insurance.

Who put us into this unemployment frenzy? Not the citizen, but the citizens will be reprimand for not having the $800 – $1500 per month for the government’s health care and become felonies. Many people cannot meet their bills now, how can they pay for health insurance.

Money controls people’s minds, set motives, and kills one thoughts and the individualism of a person. I am sorry…there are many greedy people who want health care reform for the money not to have better health care.

Give the citizens options…I do not want a crappy health care and I am paying others to have an excellent health care. I think something is wrong with this picture.

I want excellent health care too and I should come first over everyone including our jurisdiction system. I have to take care me then others….Momma taught me much better than that “take care of yourself because no one will take care of you.”

Harvey Grove
June 30, 2012

Insurance companies are NOTHING BUT LEACHES. They drain our wallets and give NOTHING in return. Thet have been able to insert themselves into our life by claiming they provide something, however, I have not be enable to figure out what that is, to this day..

They supposedly base premiums on the risk they take. I do not believe that. We are all gong to die, therefore, that is a big group and they have taught us that the bigger the group the less risk they take. Yet they insist on charging small businesses more than large groups. Is it because the small groups are not bargaining collectively. They hurt the small businesses and the people who work there. Meanwhile they keep building those big buildings.
When figuring the premiums, Thet supposedly use actuarial figures, however, they add a few percent In case they make a mistake. When there is no mistake they call that PROFIT. As it was not needed to cover a mistake it is really insurance for themselves. Why not pass it on top policy holders for a reward for continuing to stay with the company. This makes the premium do what it is supposed to do. If no unexpected risk came up that year… They did NOT need it. Since they were not entitled to it ….pass it on to their customers as it was an OVERCHARGE that had nothing to do with RISK.

(How’s that for a bumper sticker?);

Lucy Cassidy
June 30, 2012

This new law is definitely a step in the right direction. I find it disgusting that the richest nation in the world does not provide health care for all of its citizens. The problem will not be solved, however, until we get profit motive out of the equation. Insurance companies are making millions of dollars off the backs of insurance policy holders, yet they are reluctant to pay for many claims without a verbal war. We should have universal health care for all our citizens and the cost to taxpayers would probably be less than we pay for insurance coverage now. Insurance companies would have to find another way to bilk citizens.

June 29, 2012

This was a very clear post that helped me understand a lot about health care. I avoid reading about health care because it usually seems like articles are about politics, not about whether or not I am going to be able to afford health insurance as a regular bike commuter, rock climber, and automobile driver… all of which should never be done without insurance. Thanks for listing the perks and the punches. Cheers!

June 29, 2012

here’s a thought — how will this law be enforced for those who still do not buy health insurance? “a stiff penalty” will not be the answer as they simply won’t/can’t pay. i agree people cannot get a free ride off of others, but i don’t think this will solve the problem.

what about a limit on how much insurance companies can raise the premiums each year? i’m a sole proprietor, and every year my insurance increases ~$100/month, that’s $1200/year increase! my health insurance is and has always been by far the biggest expense i have…. i’m looking for an answer. ironically, i’m a health care provider and over the years insurance companies have cut my rates by 25%, lowering my income, yet have increased my costs.

July 03, 2012

Thousands of additional IRS agents are being hired to make sure that everyone pays. This will increase the number of people employed in the government, not the private sector!
That’s all we need — more government employees so we can pay their salaries, pensions and other benefits!! Such a deal!!

June 28, 2012

It seems that a lot of people wanted this to fail because they didn’t like Obama. I see it that it will overall help the American people in the long haul. I don’t know what other people think but we will see when the time comes of course. This is only my opinion.

Milton O'Dell
June 28, 2012

Your information certainly corrected a lot of misconception i got from social media.

Harris Tom
June 28, 2012

While the courts and political representatives debate over hypothetical outcomes, companies in Silicon Valley and elsewhere are actually doing something to change the paradigm and help bring healthcare up to date. Just this morning I found out about HealthTap on this interview and I must say I’m impressed.

Commenting has been closed for this post.

Harvard Health Publishing Logo

Thanks for visiting. Don't miss your FREE gift.

The Best Diets for Cognitive Fitness, is yours absolutely FREE when you sign up to receive Health Alerts from Harvard Medical School

Sign up to get tips for living a healthy lifestyle, with ways to fight inflammation and improve cognitive health, plus the latest advances in preventative medicine, diet and exercise, pain relief, blood pressure and cholesterol management, and more.

Harvard Health Publishing Logo

Health Alerts from Harvard Medical School

Get helpful tips and guidance for everything from fighting inflammation to finding the best diets for weight loss...from exercises to build a stronger core to advice on treating cataracts. PLUS, the latest news on medical advances and breakthroughs from Harvard Medical School experts.

BONUS! Sign up now and
get a FREE copy of the
Best Diets for Cognitive Fitness

Harvard Health Publishing Logo

Stay on top of latest health news from Harvard Medical School.

Plus, get a FREE copy of the Best Diets for Cognitive Fitness.