Degarelix approved for advanced prostate cancer

Nancy Ferrari

Senior editor, Harvard Health

In December 2008, the FDA approved the injectable drug degarelix (Firmagon) for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Degarelix belongs to a class of agents called gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists.* GnRH antagonists and drugs called luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists are prescribed to men as hormone therapy for prostate cancer. The drugs slow disease progression by suppressing testosterone, which plays a key role in the growth of prostate cancer.

LHRH agonists — leuprolide (Lupron) is one — may cause an initial surge in testosterone production before lowering testosterone levels. To block that surge and help prevent any tumor growth, doctors often prescribe a short course of anti-androgen therapy, which can worsen or cause additional side effects. But because it works differently, degarelix doesn’t raise testosterone levels, making an anti-androgen unnecessary.

FDA approval of degarelix was based on a year-long phase III randomized clinical trial that compared it with leuprolide. Both drugs were equally effective at suppressing testosterone levels, though degarelix appeared to work more quickly. The most common side effects were pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site; hot flashes; weight gain; fatigue; and increases in some liver enzymes.

*Note: Editor in Chief Marc Garnick, M.D., helped develop the first GnRH antagonist, abarelix (Plenaxis). He serves as a consultant to Specialty European Pharma, which is marketing abarelix in Europe.

Originally published April 1, 2009; last reviewed May 3, 2011.

Comments:

  1. Chikis

    was positive. They came up with no canecr present. So my doctor was very adamant that he was not wrong and so I went back to the hospital two months later and they did their own biopsy which came back negative. In fact they were surprised that my Urologist even did a biopsy on a PSA that was only 2.0 and that had increased one point in a year based on my family doctor’s information. Here are some original mistakes to watch out for all of you who may experieince this: my family doctor who said my PSA went up one point in a year had both readings done by different labs, not good, and then when my Urologist decided to do a biopsy based on that information without doing his own PSA test to confirm. Clearly I should have been smarter and seen that error. But then there is so much money to be made from biopsies and radical surgery Urologists will guide you straight down that road. This was all a year and a half ago and my PSA continues to decline now to almost 1.0 which I check every thre months.

Commenting has been closed for this post.