Recent Blog Articles
Monkeypox: An unfamiliar virus spreading fast — sound familiar?
Diabetes: Does a long-term study reinforce or change approaches to prevention?
War anxiety: How to cope
Can we prevent depression in older adults by treating insomnia?
Want to try veganism? Here's how to get started
Vitamin B6 flies under the radar: Are you getting enough?
The formula shortage is hurting families: What parents should know and do
Gyn Care 101: What to know about seeing a gynecologist
Swimming lessons save lives: What parents should know
Strong legs help power summer activities: Hiking, biking, swimming, and more
Harvard Health Blog
The SPRINT trial: A major advance in treating high blood pressure
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles.
No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
I was really surprised to see this study. Back in the 1980’s, when I was still in my 30’s, my blood pressure had crept up to about 140/90. My family doc told me at that time that, in the past, we would not treat this. But recent studies (remember this is the 1980″s) indicated better outcomes if we aggressively treat any blood pressure over 120/80. And, that’s what we did. Started with a calcium channel blocker, which didn’t bring it all he way back to normal, so we added an ACE inhibitor. (They are combined in one pill). That brought it down to 120/80. SInce then I have lost weight and become a much more diligent exercise enthusiast. On the same dose, my blood pressure will often be close to 110/70. The surprise (to me) is that this study brings new guidelines.
I’m medical student. I work on sirtuin gene in hypertension. I ask you to guide me for find a proposal topic to reach this gene in my brain biopsy sample that is received from rat which induced hypertrophy on they with aortic banding.
thanks a lot
I concur with Hadley. A whole-food, plant-based diet is extremely anti-inflammatory and has plenty of protein sources. Indications are that the current guidelines for protein are much higher than necessary. (check out John McDougall for a thorough review.) You might also look at Rip Esselstyn’s story. He grew up vegan, was a tri-athlete, is extremely buff, and I do not see him promoting protein supplements.
If you eat plenty of beans, you don’t need a protein powder.
I am a 61 year old female and started my headaches at 9 years old. Throughout this time I found my trigger foods and stayed away from them and if I got a headaches I had my own regime of what I took to get rid of the headache. In March of 2014 I ended up with a venous sinus thrombosis and no more could I take my regime to rid a headache. Pain pills didn’t work. Demerol has calcium sulfate that could cause a headache so that didn’t work. Out of the blue I remembered things I couldn’t eat one being Equal cause I knew Phenylalanine caused me a headache but I didn’t know that Phenylalanine is in all our foods especially meats poultry and fish big time. So I put all that down and haven’t had a headache.!! I replace it w beans. Also going to add a Phenylalanine Free protein powder. I was taking protein powder and had ungodly headaches not knowing it’s the a Phenylalanine (amino acid) that was causing it. So try it!!! I also stay away from Inflamatory foods cause obviously they cn cause headaches too.
If you are eating plenty of beans, then you don’t need a protein drink and ipso facto you don’t need to go looking for a phenylalanine-free protein powder. Right?
Commenting has been closed for this post.
Free Healthbeat Signup
Get the latest in health news delivered to your inbox!