Recent Blog Articles
Cardiovascular safety from prostate cancer drugs remains uncertain
Rising alcohol use among older adults
Easily distracted? Try meditation
Harvard Health Ad Watch: Can a wearable device reduce stress?
Listening to your hunger cues
Does your child need to bathe every day?
Can flavonoids help fend off forgetfulness?
Can physical or cognitive activity prevent dementia?
Wondering how much your medical care will cost? New rules could help
Long-lasting healthy changes: Doable and worthwhile
Exercise & Fitness
Mind over matter? How fit you think you are versus actual fitness
- By Monique Tello, MD, MPH, Contributor
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
Yes, absolutely- It’s all connected. As the authors hypothesize:
Our mindset affects our motivation. If we feel like we’re active, then we’ll live that way, and vice versa.
If we feel like we’re less active than everyone else, we feel stressed and depressed about it. Stress and depression are well known to be associated with poor health outcomes.
The placebo effect. What we expect has a great influence, not only on how we feel, but a number of other measures. This is why a sugar pill can have a clinical response, or serious side effects. There is a mind-body connection that is real and powerful.
Dr. Tello, thank you for this article as it was very interesting! I wish that my previous doctors had read this study when telling me to become more active. I had a question regarding this article: I understand that what a person believes influences them and their health but doesn’t a person still has to work towards being healthy to some extent? Thank you!
You would think that a Harvard physician would know better than to praise this kind of half-baked science as probative of anything of value.
The tools used to measure fitness don’t actually measure anything of the kind. Absent putting participants on a treadmill or ergometer and testing (at the very least) grip strength, these measures do nothing but measure movement, which is most decidedly not equivalent to fitness.
Recall-based surveys are what gave us the “fat-is-bad-for-you” movement, which still pertains and is completely baseless. They are an insipid, discredited data collection tool. Movement at work also fails the test of integrity; most labor-related work, even very heavy work, produces no fitness gains after a threshold because the body adapts to the load. If there is no further variation in load or intensity, there is no additional adaptation. This is why exercise programming must always have variation in movement, pace, duration, intensity, and load.
There were no measurements of essential physiologic markers (BP, blood lipids, blood sugar, inflammation).
Finally, motivation is nonsense. It is far less important than discipline. You want fitness and all its benefits? Do some work. This article and the study it parses are both gibberish.
I encourage Dr. Tello to return to the classroom for coursework in exercise physiology and methods.
Commenting has been closed for this post.