Recent Blog Articles
Can wearing contacts harm your vision?
Vegan and paleo: Pluses and minuses to watch
Postpartum anxiety is invisible, but common and treatable
Right-sizing opioid prescriptions after surgery
Ready for your routine medical checkup?
Nicotine addiction explained — and how medications can help
Is your vision impaired? Tips to cope
Misgendering: What it is and why it matters
Healthy brain, healthier heart?
Stories connect us
Harvard Health Blog
Focusing on gun violence could pave the way to fewer firearm-related deaths
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
Thank you for this thoughtful post. I mostly avoid information and discussion of guns, especially lately. But it’s an important topic, and you are contributing to what I hope will be good decisions that make us all safer
Many recent studies, including one by the Harvard law department, show that there is either no correlation or a NEGATIVE correlation between gun ownership and murder rates. Where law-abiding citizens are allowed to defend themselves, murder and violent crimes go down, not up. Where this right is restricted, the rates go up. Within this country, the areas where concealed carry is allowed have lower crime rates than areas with heavily restricted or non-existent concealed carry laws.
Also see http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/09/30/media-silence-is-deafening-about-important-gun-news/
This has more to do with the right to life and the right to defend that life than just the object with which life is defended. For example, how is a 90-year-old grandmother going to stop a 30-year-old man with a crowbar or knife who decides to break in her home?
I subscribe to the Harvard Health Letter for advice on health. It’s bad enough thay they use my subscription money to promote their political opinion, but now they want to use my tax money for the same purpose. Of course they make it sound as if they are just promoting research into “what works”. They must be getting BS lessons from Obama.
Norm, I agree with you. I subscribed for medical information. I do not play around with guns, but my husband legally has some for sport. Why are they preaching to the choir when it is the inner city youth who need to be rounded up and have their guns confiscated.
Here you are wright about Focusing on gun violence could pave the way to fewer firearm-related deaths i live in India here its not a problem.
Very nice post and really thoughtful post. I would like to escape from gun, the word gun hurt my heart because I would not like to hurt others. But I also think some times it gives us much importance. But your post is much important in our livelihood.
Google Kennesaw, Georgia’s gun laws. When the residents were required to possess a firearm and ammunition in each household or be fined, the crime rate went down 80+% (can’t remember exact number). When law abiding citizens are allowed to protect themselves from thugs, those who would attack them were less likely to be willing to confront someone they knew was armed. Do we need automatic weapons? No. Obama is right in restricting those weapons meant purely to kill as many people as quickly as possible, meant for the military. We do not need those to protect our homes, or to hunt. We also want to try to ensure that those that are licensed to carry a gun are not felons or mentally unstable and thus more likely to commit crimes.
I agree Tracy, we do not need anything more than rifles or pistols, but what we do need are strong mental health laws that protect the innocent rather than a mentally unhealthy person who could be violent. We have guns for protecting famous people, on our police, in the military, so I do not like saying that a normal, law-abiding person cannot have one.
You can pick, choose, and twist statistics to prove what you want. Of course, homicide by firearms is greater in this country than in Britain, which has very strict gun laws, but it was always thus, even before Britain passed the anti-gun laws. Britain’s fairly recent stringent gun-laws changed nothing. In fact, the instances of homicide by fire-arms has decreased slightly in this country compared to Britain since Britain passed its stringent gun-laws.
Britain and Australia do not have the gang violence that America has, which distorts the statistics.
Australia’s death by fire-arms has increased slightly since the recent passage of stricter gun-laws relative to neighboring New Zealand which did not pass any such laws.
You can go on forever throwing statistics back and forth.
The United States is unique, with its traditions, social conditions, and culture peculiar to itself. But it is gratifying to see that there are so many right-to-life advocates horrified by the deaths of children. Who knew.
Viewing gun related violence as a public health issue is certainly valid, and it highlights deficiencies in the systems that aim to help people, well done. But the murder rate in the US is roughly four times that of countries like Australia, New Zealand and Britain. For interest, following the 1996 Australian gun law reforms banned the sale, importation and possession of all automatic and semi-automatic rifles and shotguns, these measures were prompted by the Port Arthur massacre. Firearm homicides in Australia dropped 59 per cent between 1995 and 2006 and there was no offsetting increase in non-firearm-related murders.
Thank you for this thoughtful post. I mostly avoid information and discussion of guns, especially lately. But it’s an important topic, and you are contributing to what I hope will be good decisions that make us all safer.
I live in Canada where this is not a problem!! You want the right to “bear arms” god gave you 2 use them!!!!!
I’m with you Harry. That 2nd amendment business is so very outdated, yet the American public seem to feel they need to embrace that colonial way of thinking even though 300 years have passed them by.
How about focusing on mental health issues related to the recent shootings? And alcohol’s involvement with shootings? Not saying something should not be done. Yet please look at all the circumstances involved and not just focus on one.
Besides that an unarmed population can do very little about a corrupt government.
32,163 deaths by guns, and from and Institute of Medicine report on accidental deaths attributed to Doctors 98,000.
Just from these numbers alone three times as many people are killed by Dr’s then are by gun violence. Shouldn’t they then be looking into how they can keep from killing people first?
You are soooooooooooooooooooooo right doctors kill more kids then guns do wake up america
Doctors and the abortions that you preform kill more of our babies then nutty people do police your profession be for you comment about our guns
In listening to the nonsensical rhetoric regarding gun control in this country, it is become clear to me that no matter how much outrage we express over the violence against children in this country, the Second Amendment to the US Constitution will continue to impede the drafting of reasonable laws addressing this national crisis.
Thus, I believe the only way to allow for reasonable progress in protecting the welfare of children is to draft and ratify the following Children’s Rights Amendment (CRA) to the United States Constitution.
Section 1. As a member of the United Nations, the United States of America, and all its peoples, fully endorse and support the following statement of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: all children everywhere have the same rights, no matter where they live or what they believe.
Section 2: Every child born to this world has the right to life, survival and development; the child’s view should be taken into account in all decisions affecting his/her life.
Section 3. The best interest of the child born to this world will take primary consideration and will supersede all existing laws and amendments that otherwise could endanger the safety and welfare of children.
Section 4: All Children born to this world have the rights guaranteed by this amendment, without discrimination of any kind.
Section 5: The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 6: This amendment shall take effect immediately upon ratification.
Section 3 is the key to this concept: only after we, as advocates for children, can pass a law that supersedes the Second Amendment will meaningful legislation be passed in this country.
This fight must have a beginning, so please work to ratify this proposed Children’s Rights Amendment to the US Constitution.
Thank you for considering,
Robert Flood, MD
Associate Professor of Pediatrics,
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO
Commenting has been closed for this post.
You might also be interested in…
Harvard Health Letter
Want to reduce pain in your knees and be more active? Eat smarter and reduce your risk for a heart attack? Improve your flexibility and balance so you don’t fall? Sleep the entire night so you have more energy during the day? Take control of your health right now! In Harvard Health Letter, you’ll find easy remedies and solutions to these common challenges and more.