Recent Blog Articles
Can blue light-blocking glasses improve your sleep?
Skills children need to succeed in life — and getting youngsters started
Thinking about COVID booster shots? Here’s what to know
Cancer survivors' sleep is affected long after treatment
Do I have to yell so much?
What to do when elective surgery is postponed
What happened to trusting medical experts?
Stuttering in children: How parents can help
Icy fingers and toes: Poor circulation or Raynaud’s phenomenon?
Evoking calm: Practicing mindfulness in daily life helps
FDA won’t ban BPA—yet
- By Patrick J. Skerrett, Former Executive Editor, Harvard Health
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
good tips to prevent us from get BPA. now, we can be more alert to anything that can cause it. and now, I should more check my metal water bottle, is there any plastic linear or not.
Yes, I agree with the last poster. Thanks for pointing this out.
BPA is a hormone-disrupting chemical that’s been been linked to a variety of problems, including obesity, early puberty in girls, decreased levels of testosterone and lowered sperm counts in men and lowered immune responses.
Remember: When in doubt, ask. Even companies implying that they offer BPA-free products can’t be trusted, as so many of us learned when reusable water bottle maker Sigg came clean last year about the BPA in its liners. And if it turns out that BPA is in the product of the company you’re contacting, don’t be afraid to say that you’ll no longer be buying that product. Until the laws change, consumer demand is the only leverage we have.
BPA can affect the hearts of women, can permanently damage the DNA of mice, and appears to be entering the human body from a variety of unknown sources.
nowadays produced research should be conducted in-depth testing before release to the public.
because if it has bad effects for the long term is very dangerous
Shame that nothing was reported on studies done by other civilized countries like Canada.Or on bans already in place elsewhere.
Is information about the prevention of BPA was articulated clearly to the public. And is it really something that is harmful to human body?
The FDA should not be asking for proof that something is harmful, it should be asking for proof that something is safe to but in food. Do you need to feed people crude oil to prove it’s unsafe to consume, that seems to by the way the FDA thinks.
With a form Monsanto Employee at their head it is no surprise really.
Commenting has been closed for this post.
Free Healthbeat Signup
Get the latest in health news delivered to your inbox!