Recent Blog Articles
5 inflammation-fighting food swaps
Is IBD an underrecognized health problem in minority groups?
Sickle cell disease in newborns and children: What families should know and do
COVID-19 vaccines for children and teens: What we do — and don’t — know
Happy trails: Take a hike, now
Sleep well — and reduce your risk of dementia and death
COVID-19 vaccines and the LGBTQ+ community
Polycystic ovary syndrome and the skin
Dental appliances for sleep apnea: Do they work?
Terrified of needles? That can affect your health
Why Japan’s crisis causes worry, fear of radiation risk in the U.S.
- Author: Ann MacDonald,
As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
I’m glad to be corrected about your lack of scientific knowledge, but all I can say is that you have made my point more strongly than I could have myself.
You’re The Editor of Harvard Health Publishing, but claim to be a mere writer with an (ignorant) opinion. Does Harvard appoint just anyone to such a position, and then fail to monitor what she is saying? I think someone at Harvard who — unlike you — is prepared to be accountable for her or his opinions should apologise for the article and assure us this sort of thing will not happen again.
If keeping risks in perspective was — as you say — the point of your article, you could hardly have done a worse job.
Why should she apologize for others’ lack of reading ability? This article was about risk perception. the links included underline this. It is not a statistical paper about radiation levels. The title, the illustration, the content all state this. The other commentators were clearly looking for other information which with a modicum of effort on their part could have been obtained elsewhere, even by clicking on the related links. Perhaps you all were viewing it on your phones and didn’t bother to read fully. Also, the penchant for intellectual stratification is appalling. A “mere” writer isn’t allowed to make informed observances but a scientist can?
Perhaps it would be wise now to follow up with an expert article explaining how distance from Japan to California may lessen the risk and the fears of radiation. I’m sorry to say I do not need laymen writing about radiation or nuclear events.
I’m afraid I agree with Delman although I might not have phrased it as such. The thing that bugs me is that you are representing yourself on a Harvard Medical School site and, as such, as some kind of expert and yet the only thing I could take from you brief is that the fear imminates from the “sinister” nature of nuclear power and the potential long term impact on ourselves and our families. This does not, to any extent, explain the irrational fear that is gripping many in the US regarding Japan. The whole thing is presented a bit amateurishly. Not at the level one expects.
This is a poor article because it deals with people’s fears without commenting on whether they are groundless or not.
The spectacle of a Harvard scientist admitting her “terror” when she heard there’d been some nuclear emissions on the other side of the world would be merely ludicrous, if it weren’t contributing to the (groundless) terror of others.
Thanks for writing. Just to clarify: I am not a scientist. If you read my bio, you will see that I am a writer.
I’m all for keeping risks in perspective — that was the point of the post.
Commenting has been closed for this post.