Recent Blog Articles

Cancer

Expert panel proposes annual lung cancer test for some

Woman_undergoing_CT_scan
Published: July 30, 2013
  • Author: Howard LeWine, M.D.,

Disclaimer:

As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date of last review or update on all articles. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.

Comments

Edward
September 02, 2013

Screening, if cost-effective is one of the best ways to reduce our healthcare (and ultimately, health insurance) costs.

Under the new healthcare legislation, many more unhealthy persons will be insured, and thus, needing expensive medical treatment.

Unless a large number of young persons purchase coverage, the system will need help. Maybe increased screening is the shot in the arm that is needed.

Rex
August 03, 2013

I think annual testing is a great idea. I run an electronic cigarettes website and am interested to know if you are part of the ‘less harm’ or ‘no harm’ camp when it comes to ecigs vs no ecigs.

Pearyb
August 11, 2013

Nice post, you don’t have to read Grays’ anatomy to get plenty of info Thaks

Colon Disease Awareness
July 31, 2013

Concerning the proposed recommendations on lung cancer, it would be very helpful and relieving for a lot of folks, if having annual testings would actually prevent that many deaths as estimated. I think it is worth the try because if one thousand lives can be saved, it’s well worth it in my eyes.
I do find the sections on the downsides of screening and the changes people can make now quite interesting. Overall, I think this post was well crafted with valuable information that can be of great help for many.

Kevin Tran
July 31, 2013

Nice post

Commenting has been closed for this post.