New guidelines from the American Cancer Society (ACS)
recommend that women at very high risk for breast
cancer receive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
along with annual mammography, reports the October
2007 issue of Harvard Women’s Health Watch.
In one recent study comparing MRI, mammography, and
ultrasound in 171 women whose lifetime risk of breast
cancer was very high (20% or more), MRI proved best
at finding cancer. Of the six cancers diagnosed, MRI
detected all six, mammography only two, and ultrasound
only one. Only MRI detected the four cancers found
in women with dense breast tissue.
Even so, the ACS and other groups don’t recommend
routine MRI screening for women at average risk, for
reasons such as these:
- It leads to too many unnecessary biopsies. MRI
picks up any abnormal tissue, whether cancerous or
not.
- Mammography is getting better all the time. Digital
mammography works better than traditional mammography
in women with dense breast tissue and is becoming
increasingly available.
- MRI has limitations. It can’t
be performed on women with pacemakers or implantable
cardioverter-defibrillators, and its ability to detect
some early cancers is limited. It also isn’t
widely available.
- It’s expensive. And insurance
won’t pay for it for women at average risk.
- It’s unclear whether MRI helps women
live longer. The most important outcome
of any screening test is improved survival. We
don’t know yet if using MRI helps women live
longer.
For most women over 40, having an annual mammogram
and clinical breast exam is still the best way to catch
early-stage, highly treatable cancers, says Harvard
Women’s Health Watch.
Also in this issue:
- Recovering from a stroke
- New way to measure triglycerides
- By the way, doctor: Is palm oil good for you? Should
I take antibiotics to prevent urinary tract infections?
Should I get the shingles
vaccine?