Improving
the beat for heart failure
(This article was first printed in the June
2005 issue of the Harvard Heart Letter.
For more information or to order, please go
to www.health.harvard.edu/heart.)
Adding a special pacemaker that coordinates
the beat of the heart’s lower chambers
to state-of-the-art drug therapy helps some
people with heart failure live longer and better.
The first artificial pacemaker was a boxy device
too big to be implanted in the chest. It ran
on AC power, which tethered its user to an extension
cord and prayers against power failures. Today’s
pacemakers, some the size of a silver dollar,
fit neatly in the chest and run on their embedded
batteries for years.
Pacemakers have changed in other ways as well.
Modern ones are safer, better protected against
microwaves and other stray electromagnetic radiation,
and smarter. While early pacemakers delivered
tiny “beat now” shocks to just one
chamber of the heart, some now come close to
mimicking the complex electrical system of the
heart.
One of these is the biventricular pacemaker.
Its signals help the heart’s two lower
chambers beat in perfect unison. This is called
cardiac resynchronization therapy. Although it
sounds like a small thing, resynchronization
can help some people with heart failure stay
out of the hospital and live longer. It may even
strengthen a failing heart.
Results from a large trial of this device, called
the Cardiac Resynchronization–Heart Failure
(CARE-HF) trial, were so positive they had the
director of the trial talking about “remission” for
a condition that has long been considered as
manageable but ultimately unstoppable.
Out of sync
Damage from a heart attack, high blood pressure,
a malfunctioning heart valve, too much alcohol,
and even some viral infections can lead to heart
failure. This doesn’t mean the heart is
about to shut down. Instead, it’s the failure
of the heart to meet the body’s incessant
need for oxygen-rich blood. The heart, brain,
kidneys, and other organs strive valiantly to
compensate. Eventually, though, they can’t,
and the tissues’ demand for oxygen slowly
begins to exceed the supply.
Lack of oxygenated blood causes tiredness, shortness
of breath, difficulty walking, and trouble sleeping.
Fluid can back up into the lungs and cause swelling
in the legs. The strain on the heart can also
disrupt the flow of electrical signals through
the heart’s chambers, especially the left
ventricle.
About one in three people with heart failure
develops what doctors call ventricular dyssynchrony.
In plain language, this means the two lower chambers
aren’t contracting together. Instead, the
right ventricle beats a fraction of a second
before the left one.
Like two people trying to lift a heavy sofa
at different moments, the loss of coordination
costs the heart some of its pumping power. This
sets the stage for a gradual downward spiral.
Less power means less blood ejected with each
beat, which forces the heart to work harder.
The extra work leads to harmful changes in the
size and shape of the heart, which can lead to
even more damaging disruptions in the heart’s
electrical pathways. Out-of-sync contractions
can also throw the mitral valve out of alignment,
making the left ventricle work even harder.
Restoring a coordinated beat helps the heart
pump more efficiently. Results from the Cardiac
Resynchronization trial show it can also do much
more.
Pacemaker
evolution

Pacemakers were initially designed to
assist, or take the place of, the heart’s
own pacemaker. This football-shaped cluster
of cells is nestled in the upper right
chamber of the heart. Delivering timed
electrical signals there can lead to
a normal heartbeat. Newer pacemakers,
such as the biventricular pacemaker,
add wires to each ventricle to synchronize
their beat. |
Reasons to CARE
The trial included 813 men and women with moderate
to severe heart failure and some evidence of
out-of-sync ventricles. All received state-of-the-art
drug therapy; half also received cardiac resynchronization
therapy in the form of a biventricular pacemaker.
After two and a half years, 39% of those aided
by cardiac resynchronization had died or been
hospitalized for heart failure, significantly
less than the 55% of those on drug therapy alone.
Quality of life also improved more in the resynchronization
group than in the drugs-only group.
One-third of the heart-related deaths were sudden
deaths. These are often caused by the fast, uncoordinated
heartbeat known as ventricular fibrillation.
Combining a biventricular pacemaker with a cardioverter/defibrillator
that can shock the heart back into a normal rhythm
could further improve survival.
Perhaps most surprising, by the end of the trial
about 20% of the volunteers who received a resynchronizing
pacemaker had better left ventricular ejection
fraction, a measure of how much blood remains
in the chamber after a contraction. In some,
it had jumped above 40%, the level often used
as a cutoff for defining heart failure.
According to Dr. John G.F. Cleland, a British
cardiologist who led the CARE-HF trial, the combination
of state-of-the-art medical therapy and biventricular
resynchronization could lead to remission of
heart failure in some people.
What resynchronization won’t do
Despite its promise, cardiac resynchronization
therapy isn’t a miracle cure. In the CARE-HF
trial, 2 in 10 people who had a biventricular
pacemaker implanted died during the course of
the 30-month trial. While that’s better
than the 3-in-10 death rate with medical therapy
only, it is still a sobering reminder of the
destructive power of heart failure.
Cardiac resynchronization doesn’t work
on its own. “This isn’t a replacement
for medical therapy. It won’t get you off
any pills or eliminate the lifestyle changes
that are so important in managing heart failure,” says
Dr. Michael O. Sweeney, who directs the cardiac
pacing and implantable device unit at Harvard-affiliated
Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Finally, cardiac resynchronization isn’t
for everyone. Some people benefit from this type
of pacemaker, some don’t, and some may
actually be harmed by it. Success depends on
careful assessment of the heartbeat and precise
pacemaker placement.
It isn’t easy to spot out-of-sync ventricles.
Many doctors use an electrocardiogram (ECG).
It can spot an electrical delay through the left
bundle branch, which provides the contraction
signal for the left ventricle.
Unfortunately, ECGs sometimes miss people who
have out-of-sync ventricles and identify ventricular
dyssynchrony in people who don’t have it.
The most accurate way to tell if your ventricles
beat together is with a special echocardiogram
that translates sound waves into motion of the
heart’s wall. Right now, though, the expensive
machines needed to create these images are available
in only a few large medical centers.
Some people who are excellent candidates for
resynchronization therapy aren’t helped
by it because the device isn’t properly
implanted. One of the pacemaker’s wires
must stimulate a special spot in a vein on the
outside of the left ventricle. Putting it there
involves some tricky maneuvering. This is best
done by a team with plenty of experience implanting
biventricular pacemakers.
What you need
to know
Cardiac resynchronization therapy, in
the form of a biventricular pacemaker,
can help some people live longer and
better. This therapy
- works only for people with heart
failure whose right and left ventricles
beat out of sync
- should be diagnosed and treated by
a team that has extensive experience
working with biventricular pacemakers
and that can offer comprehensive heart
failure treatment
- does not replace medications needed
to control heart failure or careful
daily attention to weight, salt and
water intake, diet, and exercise
- may be combined with an implantable
cardioverter/defibrillator to stop
potentially deadly heart rhythms and
restore a normal heartbeat.
|
Going forward
The positive results from the CARE-HF trial
will probably vault resynchronization into the
front line of heart failure therapy. That’s
a good thing, because a properly placed biventricular
pacemaker can help someone with heart failure
and out-of-sync ventricles be more active, have
fewer symptoms such as shortness of breath or
swollen legs, avoid hospitalization for heart
failure, and live longer.
But there’s a downside to more widespread
use of this expensive therapy. In the CARE-HF
trial, pacemaker implantation caused serious
problems in about 1 of 10 recipients. These included
severe infections, pacemaker wires slipping out
of place, tears in the heart muscle, and erosion
of the pocket where the pacemaker sits in the
chest.
Cost is another issue. A biventricular pacemaker
costs at least $20,000, more if it comes with
a defibrillator. Doctors earn more money by implanting
a biventricular pacemaker-defibrillator than
by managing an individual’s heart failure
with drug therapy. This means there are what
policy makers politely call “financial
incentives” driving the use of the devices.
Cardiac resynchronization is new enough that
not all doctors know about it. If you have heart
failure, and your doctor hasn’t mentioned
resynchronization therapy as an option for you,
bring it up with him or her. If it looks like
it is right for you, try to find a team with
strong experience diagnosing out-of-sync ventricles
and implanting biventricular pacemakers.
(This article was first printed in the June
2005 issue of the Harvard Heart Letter.
For more information or to order, please go
to www.health.harvard.edu/heart.)
|