Hormone replacement therapy, the male version
Home > Welcome
Newsweek readers
Hormone
replacement, the male version
(This article was first printed in the May
2004 issue of the Harvard Health Letter. For
more information or to order, please go to http://www.health.harvard.edu/health.)
Most men don’t like to hear this, but
when it comes to testosterone, they hit their
peak at about age 17. Levels plateau for a while,
then slowly start to slide in their 30s and 40s.
By the time a man reaches 80, his testosterone
level will be about half of what it was when
he was a strapping young lad.
For decades, doctors have used synthetic testosterone
to treat a small number of men whose hormone
level is unambiguously low. Hypogonadism, as
it is called, can be caused by a problem in the
testes (where most testosterone is made) or in
the pituitary gland (the “master gland” under
the brain that secretes a signaling hormone to
get the testes into action).
But now a growing number of men in the United
States are taking testosterone to reverse the
gradual, age-related decline of the hormone,
or so-called andropause. By some estimates, the
number of testosterone prescriptions in the United
States has tripled in recent years, and total
sales now come to about $400 million a year.
That’s not much compared with the $12.5
billion spent on cholesterol-lowering statins,
but the upward trend is still impressive.
Rub it in
Testosterone isn’t taken as a pill, because
it can be toxic to the liver in that form. It’s
readily absorbed through the skin, so it’s
easy to use as a gel that is usually spread daily
on the upper arms, shoulders, and abdomen after
a morning shower, when the skin is clean and
dry. The gels have largely replaced testosterone
patches, the first transdermal method. Striant
is a gel designed to be applied to the gums.
It’s also possible to get testosterone
injections. The FDA classifies the hormone as
a controlled substance, so it’s more tightly
regulated than, say, Viagra. Testosterone products
sold over the Internet are not reliable.
Anybody who has watched the hopes for hormone
therapy in women fade as the risks become apparent
has to wonder why some men are willing to risk
the possible consequences of taking a sex hormone
that isn’t medically necessary. Some may
see this as evidence that male risk-taking behavior
(some might say foolishness) lasts even when
testosterone doesn’t!
Mainstream medicine has been duly, if predictably,
cautious. An Institute of Medicine (IOM) report
in November 2003 called for a go-slow approach,
recommending small, placebo-controlled trials
to prove benefit and then, if the results are
positive, larger studies to prove safety. In
January 2004, a review article in the New
England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
took a practical approach to what is perhaps
the thorniest issue: whether testosterone treatments
increase the risk for prostate cancer. The article
says that testosterone doesn’t cause cancer,
but that men taking it need to be monitored for
prostate cancer “given the widespread,
albeit poorly substantiated, concern” that
the hormone may stimulate the growth of hidden
cancer.
The male hormone
You can go too far with gender stereotyping
of hormones. Women make testosterone, too, although
in much smaller amounts, and the FDA has approved
Estratest, a combination estrogen-testosterone
pill, for women suffering from menopausal symptoms
like hot flashes (the testosterone dose is so
small that the risk of liver toxicity is minor).
Moreover, some of a man’s testosterone
gets converted by the liver and fat tissue into
estrogen.
Still, testosterone deserves its reputation
as the male hormone. A male fetus starts
producing it seven weeks after conception. The
adolescent surge changes the voice of a teenage
boy, makes his muscles fill out, and stimulates
his sex drive. In adult men, the hormone plays
a role in maintaining muscle mass and strength,
fat distribution, bone strength, and red blood
cell production, as well as libido and sperm
production. And yes, a metabolite of testosterone
does promote baldness, although testosterone
treatments do not.
In younger men, testosterone levels fluctuate
quite a bit, usually spiking in the early morning.
But in older men, the peaks and valleys flatten
out, so getting an accurate measurement isn’t
difficult. Only about half of the testosterone
in a man’s blood stream is biologically
active. The rest is stuck to another hormone
called, appropriately enough, the sex hormone–binding
globulin, and levels of it go up with age, furthering
the testosterone skid in older men.
Benefits and risks
There’s pretty good evidence that testosterone
treatment will make a man leaner, though not
necessarily stronger. Citing 12 placebo-controlled
studies of body composition, the IOM reported
that testosterone treatment probably does increase
lean-body mass and decrease fat. But surprisingly,
muscle strength showed no improvement in 8 of
10 studies. Results on mood and cognition are
too mixed to draw any firm conclusions. Some
researchers see a positive trend in bone density.
As for sex, no surprise — testosterone
plays an important role in sexual interest and
motivation. Some research hints at a use-it-or-lose-it
feedback loop — testosterone levels increase
with sexual stimulation and activity, and decline
after long periods of celibacy. But even men
with low levels of the hormone can have erections.
Testosterone therapy hasn’t been effective
as a treatment for erectile dysfunction. In younger
men it shrinks the testes and in all men, drops
the sperm count. Yet doctors who prescribe testosterone
say their patients often report that it improves
the quality of their erections.
On the risk side, one of the big worries has
been heart attacks and other cardiovascular problems.
But research has chipped away at that idea. Low,
not high, testosterone has been linked to cardiovascular
risks like diabetes. Testosterone treatment does
not have an appreciable effect on cholesterol.
In clinical studies, treatment has been shown
to widen coronary arteries and may even help
angina. Red blood cell counts sometimes go up,
although this is more common with injections
of the hormone. For men with anemia, that side
effect could be a plus. But higher red blood
cell counts can also make the blood thicker and
therefore more likely to clot. So doctors who
prescribe testosterone should be careful about
monitoring red blood cell counts.
The other big worry is prostate cancer. Testosterone
doesn’t seem to initiate it. In fact, there’s
reason to believe that in men with naturally
high levels, the hormone may act as a prostate
cancer inhibitor. On the other hand, it’s
pretty clear that once prostate cancer is present,
the cancerous cells need testosterone and related
hormones to grow. About half of all men over
age 50 harbor cancer cells in their prostate
that aren’t causing symptoms or doing any
real harm. Theoretically at least, testosterone
treatment might “wake up” those cells
and make them aggressively cancerous. To guard
against that, some doctors insist on a prostate
biopsy to rule out the presence of cancer before
they start a man on testosterone therapy.
Risks from
testosterone replacement

|
Who qualifies as having low testosterone?
There is an unsettling imprecision in all of
this. The clinical trials so far have been too
small or too short, or both, to draw firm conclusions.
We’re years away from having results from
definitive studies, if and when they’re
ever done. With so much uncertainty, what should
be done in the meantime? Dr. Peter Snyder, an
endocrinologist at the University of Pennsylvania,
took a stab at answering that question in an
article published in the aforementioned issue
of the New England Journal of Medicine. Here
are four principles he outlined:
Strict criteria for a diagnosis. For men over
65, a diagnosis of testosterone deficiency should
be limited to those who have three early-morning
tests that are “unequivocally subnormal.” But
reflecting the uncertainty surrounding the issue,
Snyder hedges on a cutoff number and says it
should be “perhaps below 200 ng/dL.”
Treatment only for those with a diagnosis. Men
with testosterone levels that aren’t quite
so low (200–300 ng/dL) might benefit from
testosterone, but the “prudent course” would
be to treat only men with very low levels.
Monitor testosterone levels. The symptoms of
testosterone deficiency are so general (fatigue,
depressed mood, diminished muscle mass, etc.)
that measuring testosterone levels is the best
way to tell whether the treatment is working.
In men over 65, the goal should be 300–450
ng/dL, the middle of the normal range for that
age.
Monitor for testosterone-dependent diseases.
Benign prostate enlargement and prostate cancer
are the main concerns, but doctors should also
check for worsening of sleep apnea, breast tenderness,
and elevated red blood cell counts.
Alternate routes, same destination
In theory, a methodical, low-risk approach like
Snyder’s may make sense. Cautious doctors
and their patients may follow it. But Dr. Abraham
Morgentaler, a Harvard-affiliated urologist and
one of the coauthors of the NEJM review article,
regards Snyder’s advice as highly conservative.
For example, he says 400 ng/dL, not 200, is the
cutoff often used for low testosterone by many
urologists.
More fundamentally, Dr. Morgentaler says that
focusing on the numbers is putting the cart before
the horse. In his opinion, doctors should let
the symptoms be the primary guide, with testosterone
levels serving as useful backup information.
Dr. Morgentaler also believes that some of the
misgivings about testosterone treatment stem
from prejudices about aging. We look askance
at older people who don’t act their age,
which is to say old and frail.
But there are ways to slow the aging process
that are certifiably safe and “natural,” if
not quite as easy as smearing on a hormone-laden
cream every morning. Weight-bearing exercise
builds muscle mass, keeps off fat, and makes
bones stronger. Walking keeps the cardiovascular
system in shape. Fatigue often can be traced
back to solvable sleep problems. Finally, we
tend to want to defy age, when just a little
more acceptance would make us relax about it.
Eighty doesn’t feel like 18 or even 38,
but should men want it to?
(This article was first printed in the May
2004 issue of the Harvard Health Letter. For
more information or to order, please go to http://www.health.harvard.edu/health.)
|
 |
|
The Harvard Health Letter delivers timely, authoritative
health information from one of the world’s most trusted sources – the
experts at Harvard Medical School. Read more »
|