All in the family: Heredity and prostate cancer
Home > Welcome
Newsweek readers
All
in the family: Heredity and prostate cancer
(This article was first printed in the March
2003 issue of the Harvard Men's Health Watch.
For more information or to order, please go
to http://health.harvard.edu/men.)
At the most basic level, all
cancers are genetic. The unrestrained growth
that characterizes malignant cells depends on
defects in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA),
the cells’ genetic master code. DNA is
a complex molecule, and errors creep in all the
time. In most cases, the cell can correct its
own defects, but when repairs fail, important
diseases — including cancer — can
develop.
Although all cancers depend
on genetic abnormalities, not all defects are
hereditary; while some are indeed passed down
from generation to generation, others are acquired
in the course of a lifetime. And even when DNA
abnormalities are present at birth, they don’t
necessarily cause illness in the years ahead.
In fact, most cancer genes can’t ignite
malignancies unless they are aided by additional
assaults on health, such as exposure to radiation
or toxins.
Although prostate cancer is
the most common internal malignancy in men, it
has taken years for scientists to recognize that
heredity plays an important role in causing it.
And researchers are just now uncovering the actual
genetic defects that predispose men to prostate
cancer; it’s important progress that can
help warn certain men of an increased risk. And
while the benefits of screening are unproven,
men with a hereditary predisposition to prostate
cancer may choose to undergo prostate-specific
antigen (PSA) screening 5–10 years
earlier than at the usual age of 50 (see HMHW, July
2001). And they may also decide to change their
lifestyles in ways that may prevent an inherited
prostate cancer gene from doing its work (see HMHW, March
and May 2001).
The impact of heredity
There is no doubt that prostate
cancer runs in families. The link was first suspected
in 1956, but it wasn’t demonstrated clearly
until the early 1970s. Since then, at least a
dozen studies have provided confirmation. Most
depend on a well-established technique called
the case control method. It involves identifying
men with prostate cancer and then surveying their
families to learn how many relatives also have
the disease. At the same time, researchers investigate
the families of an equal number of age-matched
men who do not have prostate cancer.
By comparing the prevalence
of prostate cancer in the relatives of the cancer
patients and in those of the healthy men, scientists
can establish a relative risk ratio. For
example, if prostate cancer is twice as likely
to develop in men with family histories of the
disease as in men whose families are free of
it, the relative risk would be 2.0. In other
words, having prostate cancer in the family would
double a man’s risk of developing the disease.
Although many studies agree
that having a relative with prostate cancer is
a risky business, they disagree on just how risky;
estimates range from relative risks as low as
1.7 to as high as 8.7. There is, of course, a
big difference between a 70% and an 870% increase
in risk. The discrepancies can be resolved, in
part, by reading the fine print. The impact of
family history is greatest when close relatives
have the disease, when multiple relatives have
been afflicted, and when the disease has been
diagnosed at an early age.
All in all, a man who has a
father or brother with clinically diagnosed prostate
cancer is one and a half to three times more
likely to develop the disease than a man with
no family history. Grandfathers, uncles, and
cousins have a much smaller impact — but
a man with many affected relatives is at highest
risk, particularly if the disease has been diagnosed
before the age of 60. The table below shows an
estimate of how these factors affect risk.
Family
history and prostate cancer risk |
| Family
history |
Estimated
relative risk |
Estimated
lifetime risk |
No
prostate cancer |
— |
8% |
Father
diagnosed after age 60 |
1.5% |
12% |
One
brother diagnosed after age 60 |
2.0% |
15% |
Father
diagnosed before age 60 |
2.5% |
20% |
One
brother diagnosed before age 60 |
3.0% |
25% |
Two
relatives with prostate cancer |
4.0% |
30
% |
Three
or more relatives with prostate cancer |
5.0% |
35%–45% |
Relative
risk = Increase in risk in comparison
to men with no family history of prostate
cancer
Lifetime risk = Overall
chance of developing prostate cancer
during a man’s lifetime
Source: Bratt, O. Journal
of Urology 2002, vol. 168, p.
907. |
Nature vs. nurture
Families share more than genes;
they may also have common environmental exposures,
dietary patterns, exercise habits, socioeconomic
status, and educational levels. When prostate
cancer runs in a family, is it due to genetic
factors or lifestyle influences, to nature or
nurture?
Scientists turned to a unique
resource, the Scandinavian twin registries, which
contain medical and demographic data on 44,788
pairs of Swedish, Danish, and Finnish twins.
The subjects include both monozygotic twins, who
are genetically identical, and dizygotic twins, who
are no closer genetically than siblings who are
not twins. In addition, the registry includes
twins who were raised in the same household as
well as those who were separated early in life.
By comparing the incidence of cancer in each
category of individuals, the researchers were
able to calculate the relative importance of
hereditary and environmental factors for 11 different
types of cancer.
The study found that heredity
makes only a minor contribution to most malignancies.
But prostate cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal
cancer were the exceptions. In each disease,
heredity was very important indeed — and
it had a greater impact on prostate cancer than
on the other hereditary tumors. In all, the scientists
calculated that 42% of the risk of prostate cancer
depends on inherited factors; for colorectal
and breast cancers, the figures are 35% and 27%,
respectively.
Other cancers
It is clear that a family history
of prostate cancer boosts a man’s risk
of developing the disease — but does a
family history of other malignancies also increase
his risk for prostate cancer?
Yes — in some cases, at
least. The link is strongest for breast cancer.
Researchers from the American Cancer Society
tracked 480,802 men who were free of cancer when
the study began in 1982. During the next 17 years,
3,141 men died of prostate cancer. Among men
with no family history of prostate cancer, those
with a family history of breast cancer were more
likely to die from prostate cancer than those
without breast cancer in a relative.
The overall risk was very modest,
but it was more appreciable among men younger
than 65 whose relatives were diagnosed with breast
cancer before age 50 (a 65% increase in risk)
and among Jewish men (a 73% increase). And while
a much smaller Swedish study found no link between
hereditary prostate cancer and most malignancies,
it raised the possibility of an association between
prostate cancer and cancers of the stomach and
kidney as well as the breast.
Which genes?
Each human being has more than
30,000 individual genes; only a handful contribute
to prostate cancer.
After years of intensive study,
scientists in Sweden and the U.S. identified
the first prostate cancer gene in 1996. With
a logic that’s sometimes missing in medical
terminology, they called it hereditary prostate
cancer 1 (HPC1). The gene, which is
located on chromosome 1, is responsible for about
3% of all prostate cancers. In all, about 1 in
every 500 American men carries HPC1.
A second prostate cancer gene, HPC2, was
discovered in 2000. Found on chromosome 17, HPC2 is
subject to at least three distinct mutations;
the two more common abnormalities confer only
a modest increase in risk, but the rare type
may send a man’s risk soaring to 200 or
even 300 times normal. In all, HPC2 accounts
for 4%–5% of prostate cancer cases.
Because no single genetic abnormality
accounts for most cases of prostate cancer, it
is highly likely that many genes share the responsibility.
In addition to HPC1 and HPC2, other
suspect genes include MSRI (a gene that
also increases cardiac risk), ELAC2, the androgen
receptor gene, RNASEL, and two genes on the
sex chromosomes, one on the X, the other on the
Y. Finally, the breast cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2,
appear to have a role in prostate cancer; in
particular, a specific BRCA2 mutation
(13q) may quadruple a man’s risk for prostate
cancer.
Every man should try to improve
the lifestyle factors that may contribute to
prostate cancer. Although none of the interventions
has proven effective, men with an inherited strike
against them may be wise to change their ways
before the final proof is in. Nutrition is the
crucial element, and reducing saturated fat is
the most important preventive measure. There
is also good evidence to support a high intake
of tomatoes and other vegetables, soy, whole
grains, fish, and nuts and seeds. Men at high
risk might also decide to get lots of vitamin
D while avoiding a high intake of calcium. Although
foods appear more protective than supplements,
selenium and possibly vitamin E may also help.
Finally, although the evidence is mixed, regular
exercise may confer some benefit.
Even if prevention fails, early
diagnosis may help. Measuring the amount of PSA
in a man’s blood is the best way to detect
prostate cancer in its earliest, most curable
form. The test is simple and inexpensive, but
it’s controversial, both because of erroneous
results and because doctors don’t know
if early detection will lead to a longer life,
much less a better quality of life (see HMHW, July
2001). Although the 2002 report of the U.S. Preventive
Services Task Force does not endorse PSA screening,
the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the American
Urological Association (AUA) recommend that doctors
discuss the pros and cons of PSA screening with
their patients, then offer annual testing starting
at the age of 50. But for men at increased risk,
including men with family histories of the disease
and African Americans, they suggest starting
the discussion at 40 (AUA) or 45 (ACS).
Family first
Prostate cancer is a worry for
all men, regardless of their family history.
Still, it’s important to retain perspective,
remembering that only 3 of every 100 American
men will die from the disease. Remember, too,
that prostate cancer is just one example of a
malady that can run in families; others include
coronary artery disease, high blood pressure,
stroke, colon cancer , obesity, and diabetes.
Of course, not every man in an affected family
will develop the disease, and every man can take
steps to improve his odds. That’s why it’s
important for you to look at your family tree,
keeping track of the branches that are diseased
as well as the healthy ones.