| |
Deep brain
stimulation
(This article was first printed in the April
2006 issue of the Harvard Mental Health
Letter. For more information or to order,
please go to http://www.health.harvard.edu/mental.)
The use of electromagnetic devices to treat
psychiatric disorders, long confined to electroconvulsive
therapy (ECT), has expanded in recent years because
of advances in brain imaging, computer control,
and microelectronics. Transcranial magnetic stimulation,
vagus nerve stimulation, and magnetic seizure
therapy have arrived. In early 2006, an electrical
technique, deep brain stimulation, is being proposed
for patients with severe depression and obsessive-compulsive
disorder.
It works this way: A surgeon implants electrodes
at precise locations in the brain and connects
them with a thin wire to an electrical generator
in the chest, sometimes called a brain pacemaker.
The generator can interrupt activity or excite
inhibitory neurons in the circuits where the
electrodes are placed. The apparatus is programmed
with a magnetic device passed over the skin that
adjusts the current, duration, and frequency
of the electrical pulses. Each electrode has
several contacts that can be manipulated separately.
Stimulation can be continuous or intermittent,
and the patient can turn the machine on and off.
As of early 2006, deep brain
stimulation already has FDA approval for the
treatment of Parkinson’s disease, dystonias
(severe muscle spasms), and certain kinds of
chronic pain, and it is under investigation for
patients with epilepsy and cluster headaches.
Testing in obsessive-compulsive disorder and
depression has just begun. In one study, the
treatment was given to six patients with severe
chronic depression who had not been helped by
psychotherapy, ECT, or drugs. Four of the six
responded well and were still doing well after
a year. In another study, four patients with
obsessive-compulsive disorder received the treatment.
Three of them improved, at least one dramatically
and perhaps permanently. The difference was obvious
when the stimulus was turned on and off.
The technique could also have potential in the
treatment of other severe mental illnesses, and
in improving knowledge of the brain circuits
affected by those illnesses. Unlike procedures
that involve ablation (cutting) of brain tissue — already
used in rare cases of obsessive-compulsive disorder — deep
brain stimulation is reversible and adjustable.
But it is a more drastic measure than other electromagnetic
techniques, because of the risks and high cost
of brain surgery. Adjusting the apparatus often
requires many visits to a doctor, and the battery
that fires the pacemaker has to be replaced every
two to three years, which means more surgery.
So deep brain stimulation is likely to remain
a last resort, used only when other possibilities
are exhausted.
References
Aouizerate B, et al. “Deep
Brain Stimulation for OCD and Major Depression,” American
Journal of Psychiatry (November
2005): Vol. 162, No. 11, p. 2192.
Greenberg BD, et al. “Mechanisms
and the Current State of Deep Brain Stimulation
in Neuropsychiatry,” CNS Spectrums (July
2003): Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 522–25.
Husted DS, et al. “A
Review of the Treatment for Refractory
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: From Medicine
to Deep Brain Stimulation,” CNS
Spectrums (November 2004): Vol. 9,
No. 11, pp. 833–47.
Mayberg HS, et al. “Deep
Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant
Depression,” Neuron (March
3, 2005): Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 651–60.
Medical and ethical issues surrounding
deep brain stimulation are discussed in
the testimony of G. Rees Cosgrove, M.D.,
before the President’s Council on
Bioethics, at www.bioethics.gov/transcripts/june04/session6.html. |
(This article was first printed in the April
2006 issue of the Harvard Mental Health
Letter. For more information or to order,
please go to http://www.health.harvard.edu/mental.)
|
|