|
|
How to Stay Healthy
- H1N1 and its descendents
- How your feet work — and three steps for keeping them healthy
- Women’s hearts need extra attention
- 12 ways to cut health care costs
- New Year’s resolutions for health
- Sinusitis
- Why we should exercise — and why we don’t
- Heat wave
- Ways to minimize jet lag
- Cancer screening as we age
- Brushing up on brushing
- The dubious practice of detox
- You don’t have to take a pill
- Four small lifestyle changes can mean an extra 14 year
- Eight for 2008: Eight things you should know about osteoporosis and fracture risk
- Cold Comfort
- The top ten health stories of 2007
- The truth about fats: bad and good
- Exercise without losing weight
- Certain symptoms may be early signs of ovarian cancer
- Exercise: Rx for overcoming osteoarthritis
- The shingles vaccine: Why hasn’t it caught on?
- Doctor-patient communication: A shared responsibility
- Repaying
your sleep debt
- Preventing
diabetes: Understanding and diagnosing the disease
- Yellow
light on pain relievers
- 9
tips for your health and the planet’s
- 9
ways to protect your heart when diabetes threatens it
- Prehypertension:
Does it really matter?
- Trans
fats banned in NYC restaurants
- Abdominal
fat and what to do about it
- Take
it with a grain of salt
- Added sweeteners
- Ten
steps for keeping heart disease in check
- New
immunizations for adults
- Why not
flaxseed oil?
- The negative symptoms
of schizophrenia
- Air travel and
your health
- Relaxation techniques:
Breath control helps quell errant stress response
- Good nutrition:
Should guidelines differ for men and women?
- Wash your hands
- The skin cancer
you haven’t heard about
- No coughing matter
- 12 ways to keep
your brain young
- Calcium and
Vitamin D: Necessary for Bone Health?
- Don’t
let decongestants squeeze your heart
- Digital mammography
better for some women
- Staying healthy
in your car: Coping with illness and age
- The danger of untreated
sleep apnea
- Going DEET-free
- Potassium lowers
blood pressure
- Living wills and
health care proxies
- Should you be taking
aspirin? It depends.
- Treating opiate
addiction, Part II: Alternatives to maintenance
- Is it okay to be
fat if you’re fit?
- Lessons
to learn from the COX-2 saga
- Aspirin for heart
attack: Chew or swallow?
- The new dietary
dos and don’ts
- New breastfeeding
guidelines
- Vioxx taken off
the market
- Sweetened drinks
raise women's risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes
- Swan song for antioxidant
supplements?
- Secondhand smoke:
Unsafe in any amount
- LDL cholesterol:
Low, lower, and lower still
- Dietary Factors
Affecting Gout
- Low carb vs. low
fat
- Benefits from moderate
drinking extended?
- Alcohol Increases
the Risk of Gout
- Low potassium levels
from diuretics
- Virtual Colonoscopy
- Benefits of Moderate
Sun Exposure
- Air travel health
tips
- Asthma care for
children
- Exercise and the
Risk of Stroke, Heart Disease
- CRP: A new test
for heart disease risk
- Active lifestyle
free of alcohol, tobacco may promote sexual health in men
- Flu vaccine info
for 2003
- Safeguarding prescription
medications for children
- Respiratory Tract
Infection – Is it contagious?
- Whooping cough
vaccine: Why every child needs it
- Vitamin A and hip
fracture risk
- News on blood pressure
drugs
- Killer snow
- Medications
for postmenopausal osteoporosis prevention
- Living independently — and
safely — in your later years
- Physical activity benefits all ages
- How to apply sunscreen for maximum
protection
- No link found between prostate
cancer and vasectomy
- New Developments in Hormone Replacement
Therapy
- Drinking Tea Benefits Heart and Bones
- Aspirin and heart disease
- Healthy Diet Eradicates Need
for Trendy Supplements in Elderly
- Fish for Good Health
- Asthma Education Leads to Improvement
in Children
- Hepatitis A Vaccine is Safe
and Effective for Children
- Home visitation program improve seniors'
lives
- Immunizations for 2002
- New Cancer Prevention Guidelines
- Periodontitis and Heart Disease
- Obesity in Children is on the Rise
- Birth Control Patch
- Bicycle Helmets Save Lives
- Advanced Macular Degeneration and Nutritional
Supplements
- White-Coat Hypertension
- Long or Irregular Menstrual Period and
Diabetes Risk
- Sugar and Tooth Decay
- Vaccine safety: no link between thimerosal
and neurodevelopmental disorders
- Lyme Disease Update
- Flu Vaccine and Recurrent Heart Attack
Risk
- Take Low-Dose Aspirin and Skip Vitamin E to
Prevent Cardiovascular Disease
- Early Childcare and Communicable Illnesses
- Walk, Don't Run for Weight Loss
- National Cholesterol Education Program Releases
New Guidelines for Treating and Preventing High Cholesterol
- Study Shows Fish Consumption Protects Against
Stroke, But FDA Suggests Pregnant Women Should Take Caution
- Reducing Your Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis
During Airline Travel
- Pet Reptiles and Salmonella
- Starve a Cold, Feed a Fever, Take a Pill
for the Flu?
Return to Chapter Index
News
on blood pressure drugs
Behind the scenes at your doctor’s office debate continues about
which drug should be the first line of treatment for high blood pressure.
Diuretics (also known as water pills) have been around for decades, but
the makers of newer, more specialized — and more costly — drugs
have been wooing physicians and their patients. The question isn’t
whether these drugs work effectively to lower blood pressure; they do.
But evidence indicating which is best at reducing heart disease and other
cardiovascular events has been missing — until now.
The ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent
Heart Attack Trial) study was designed to compare a diuretic to three
other commonly prescribed classes of antihypertensive drugs — calcium
channel blockers (CCBs), alpha-adrenergic blockers, and angiotensin-converting
enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. The study involved 42,000 patients over the
age of 55 with hypertension and one other risk factor for heart disease,
such as previous heart attack or stroke. Each of the patients was randomly
assigned to receive one of the study drugs for four to eight years. Researchers
monitored the patients’ blood pressures and recorded evidence of
heart disease and cardiovascular events.
Part of the study was halted early when evidence showed patients taking
the alpha-adrenergic blocker had higher rates of cardiovascular disease
and heart failure than patients taking the diuretic.
The primary results of the comparison of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril
and the CCB amlodipine to the diuretic chlorthalidone were striking.
The occurrence of death from heart disease was the same across each of
the groups, and the rate of nonfatal heart attack was also similar. However,
a slightly higher percentage of patients taking the diuretic chlorthalidone
achieved better blood pressure control. Chlorthalidone was also better
at preventing heart failure than amlodipine, the CCB. Patients taking
the ACE inhibitor lisinopril had a higher risk of stroke, angina, and
heart failure. In particular, black participants who took lisinopril
had a 40% higher risk of stroke than black participants who took the
diuretic.
The findings of the ALLHAT study indicate that when it comes to drugs
for high blood pressure, newer and more costly does not mean better.
In fact, diuretics should be the first line of treatment for many people
with high blood pressure. Not only are they better at controlling high
blood pressure while preventing major cardiovascular events, diuretics
also cost less than the other drugs. A one-year supply of Chlorthalidone
costs about $96, while the CCB amlodipine would set you back $480. Lisinopril
costs $384 a year for the brand name drug (either Zestril or Prinovil),
and $240 for the generic.
What should you do with these study results? If you’re just starting
drug treatment for high blood pressure, you might want to try a diuretic
first. If you, like most people, need a combination of drugs to keep
your blood pressure in check, one should probably be a diuretic. If you’re
already taking a different kind of medicine and it is working well for
you, there’s no need to switch. However, if you want to cut down
your drug bills, you might want to talk to your doctor about a diuretic.
(Journal of the American Medical Association, December 18,
2002)
February 2003 Update
Back to Top
Killer snow
Every winter, about 1,200 Americans die from a heart attack or some
other cardiac event during or after a big snowstorm, and shoveling is
often the precipitating event.
Why is shoveling so hazardous?
- Shoveling uses your shoulders and arms, and upper body exercise
tends to put strain on the heart because those muscles aren’t
well conditioned.
- Working in an upright position adds to the arduousness because
blood pools in the legs and feet, so to maintain blood pressure,
your heart must work harder.
- Much of snow shoveling is isometric exercise: your muscles
are working, but there's little actual movement until you finally
heave a shovelful up on the bank. During isometric exercise of any
type, your heart rate goes up, and your blood vessels constrict,
presumably to send more blood to the straining muscles. As a result,
your blood pressure goes up.
- Without knowing it, shovelers sometimes perform a version
of the Valsalva maneuver, bearing down as they would during
a bowel movement while holding their breath. Waiting to exhale while
straining like that can lead to abrupt changes in your heartbeat
and blood pressure.
- First thing in the morning, the time when many people dig
out from a storm, stress hormone levels tend to be higher, platelets
in the blood “stickier,” and heart attacks more likely.
- Shoveling involves exposure to the cold, another cardiac
stressor.
- People who are out of shape often shovel, making the sudden
intense exercise even harder on the heart.
- Most people don’t warm up before they shovel or cool
down afterward.
If you have a heart condition, you shouldn’t shovel under any
circumstances. People older than 50 should also try to avoid it. Contact
your local council on aging to see if they provide a list of teens in
your neighborhood who you can hire to do the job for you. Or buy a snow
blower. If you must shovel, take it easy. Rest often. Dress warmly and
stay well hydrated. Wherever possible, push the snow rather than lift
it. Clear only the snow that blocks your path into the house, the rest
will melt on its own. And of course, listen to your body. Head home if
you experience potential signs of heart trouble, including chest pain,
palpitations, undue shortness of breath, fatigue, lightheadedness, or
nausea. Also stop if your fingers or toes get numb or hurt — you
could have frostbite.
January 2003 Update
Back to Top
Medications
for postmenopausal osteoporosis prevention
Risk of osteoporosis increases after menopause, when levels of estrogen — which
helps preserve bone density — drop. Until recently, most doctors
recommended long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to treat postmenopausal
women who need medication to prevent bone loss. But things changed after
results from a large trial on a common HRT drug showed that estrogen
plus progestin (as the medication Prempro) did more harm than good. An
increased risk for breast cancer and cardiovascular events outweighed
the benefits of less colorectal cancer and fewer fractures. (See the
Update from July 2002 for more information on the trial.)
Health experts now encourage most women who have been taking long-term
HRT for osteoporosis prevention to consider an alternative. Fortunately
there are several options. Each of the FDA-approved treatments (see chart)
has potential benefits and risks that women and their doctors should
weigh before making a decision. Even with HRT’s proven risks, it
may still be a good choice for certain women — especially in lower
doses, which recent data have shown to have bone benefits comparable
to higher, standard doses.
Approved medications
for osteoporosis prevention |
Medication |
How to take it |
Bone benefits |
Side effects |
Comments |
Alendronate (Fosamax) |
Orally, once daily in the morning or as a larger
dose once a week; take with 6–8 ounces of water and stay
upright for 30 minutes. |
Increases bone density at the spine and hip; reduces
spinal and hip fracture risk. Side effects uncommon. |
Heartburn, nausea, inflammation of the esophagus,
muscle pain. |
Interferes with cells that break down bone. Well-tolerated
when taken properly. |
Risedronate (Actonel) |
Orally, once daily in the morning or as a larger
dose once a week; take with 6–8 ounces of water and stay
upright for 30 minutes. |
Increases bone density at the spine and hip; reduces
spinal and hip fracture risk. Side effects uncommon. |
Abdominal pain, nausea, constipation, joint pain. |
Interferes with cells that break down bone. Well-tolerated
when taken properly. |
Raloxifene (Evista) |
Orally, once daily, any time. |
Increases bone density (but less so than alendronate
or risedronate); reduces spinal fracture risk. Side effects uncommon. |
Hot flashes, leg cramps, deep-vein blood clots. |
Acts like estrogen in bone but is an anti-estrogen
in breast tissue; may reduce breast cancer risk. |
Estrogen (Premarin, Estrace, other brands) |
Orally, once daily, any time; or weekly by skin patch. |
Increases bone density; some evidence for fracture
reduction. |
Increases the risk for breast cancer (after 4–5
years) and cardiovascular events when combined with a progestin
(as Prempro) and taken orally. |
May be recommended if other medications are not tolerable
or menopausal symptoms persist. |
Sources: Boosting Bone Strength: A Guide
to Preventing and Treating Osteoporosis, Harvard Health Publications,
Boston, 2000; Managing Osteoporosis, Part 3: Prevention and
Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, American Medical
Association, 2000; Osteoporosis: Guide to Prevention, Diagnosis,
and Treatment, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston,
2002 |
December 2002 Update
Back to Top
Living independently — and
safely — in your later years
The majority of older people remain independent well into later life.
Most seniors want to remain in their own homes, a goal that’s easier
to accomplish if they adapt their lives and homes to accommodate their
aging bodies. Some tips for independent living include:
Redecorate. The average home is riddled with obstacles
that older eyes and feet might not be able to maneuver around. Removing
slippery throw rugs, using night lights, putting nonskid mats in the
bathroom and kitchen, not using high-gloss floor polishes, and installing
handrails that extend beyond the bottom stair can all help. You can often
fit your bathrooms with items like walk-in showers, grab bars, and higher
toilet seats. Ramps, elevators, and other devices can help you handle
stairs. Keep often-needed items in the handiest cabinets and use a grasping
tool to get things that are out of reach instead of climbing on a chair
or ladder.
Lifestyle changes. Wearing rubber-soled shoes and getting
regular exercise can help keep you upright. Activities like tai chi or
yoga especially help since they work on balance and strength, and are
not jarring on muscles or bones. Limit your alcohol intake and learn
whether any of your medications might cause dizziness or affect your
balance.
Seek helping hands. Shopping for groceries and other
essentials can be accomplished over the phone and via the Internet these
days. Meal preparation, transportation, home repair, housecleaning, and
help with financial or personal tasks such as paying bills and bathing
might be hired out if you can afford it, shared among friends and family,
or included in the repertoire of elder services offered in your community
or through insurance.
Plan for emergencies. Who can check in on you regularly?
Whom can you call in an emergency? What would happen if you fell and
couldn’t reach the phone? Keep emergency numbers near each phone
or, better still, on speed dial. Carry a cell phone or consider investing
in a personal alarm system, if necessary. Look into companionship services
or simple visits and phone checks from a local agency on aging or religious
group. To find agencies near you, call the Eldercare Locator at 1-800-677-1116
or visit their web site at www.aoa.dhhs.gov/elderpage/locator.html.
October 2002 Update
Back to Top
Physical activity benefits
all ages
The frail health often associated with aging is in large part due to
physical inactivity, according to a report released by the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS). It also advises that it’s never
too late to benefit from becoming physically active.
The report cites that even moderate levels of activity — such
as washing a car or raking leaves — can produce considerable benefits
that can be even more noticeable in older adults. Regular exercise improves
cholesterol levels, reduces blood pressure, cuts body fat, and lowers
blood sugar. Physical activity also improves bone and muscle strength.
All in all, people who exercise live longer — and they also live
better.
Current guidelines recommend at least 30 minutes of moderate physical
activity a day. However, few older Americans reach this level. Lack of
physical activity and poor diets are the major causes of obesity, an
epidemic that is affecting people of all ages.
In the '70s and '80s, doctors were telling Americans to run; now, they
are asking people to walk. Walking can be a moderately intense aerobic
activity. But even at a more relaxed pace, walking has huge benefits.
The distance actually seems more important than the pace — and
it doesn't take heroic distances to get real benefit. In 1993, the Harvard
Alumni study found that men who walked just 1.3 miles a day had a 22%
lower death rate than those who walked less than 0.3 mile a day.
Strong muscles also improve your health. So set aside 15 minutes two
or three times a week for resistance or strength training as well as
10–15 minutes at least three times a week for stretching exercises.
The HHS report provides strategies that individuals, doctors, and even
communities can follow to promote physical activity. Individuals are
encouraged to take part in activities that they enjoy and to make them
a daily part of life. Doctors should help patients start and continue
these regimens and overcome any difficulties they encounter. Communities
can establish programs tailored to seniors’ physical activity needs
and improve walking or bike trails.
The complete report is available at www.ahrq.gov/ppip/activity.htm
August 2002 Update
Back to Top
How to apply sunscreen
for maximum protection
Most families follow common medical advice and take along a bottle of
sunscreen when they're spending a day in the sun. But how do you know
if you're applying enough? Most people don't, but a letter published
in the June 22, 2002, issue of the British Medical Journal may
help clarify the amount of sunscreen you should use and how often you
should apply it.
The letter, written by Drs. Steve Taylor and Brian Diffey, suggests
people follow the "rule of nines" to get the sun protection factor (SPF)
that's listed on the bottle. According to the rule, you should divide
your body into 11 different sections, each making up about 9% of your
total surface area:
- Head, neck, and face
- Left arm
- Right arm
- Upper back
- Lower back
- Upper front torso
- Lower front torso
- Left upper leg and thigh
- Right upper leg and thigh
- Left lower leg and foot
- Right lower leg and foot
For sufficient protection, use a two-finger approach: cover each of
the 11 sections with enough sunscreen to span the length of your pointer
and middle fingers.
The authors admit that this is more sunscreen than most people feel
comfortable wearing, so they suggest that people put on half that amount
at one time, and then apply another dose a half hour later. Studies have
shown that sunscreen users do not apply enough sunscreen to protect the
whole body. As a result, the actual SPF is close to half that on the
product label.
It's also worth noting that according to the American Academy of Dermatologists,
staying out of the sun is the best way to prevent skin cancer. Because
harmful sun rays like UVA and infrared get through sunscreen, you shouldn't
think of it as a shield against the sun or use it as an excuse to stay
out longer. Although sunscreen is an important part of sun protection,
it is second to wearing a shirt and hat and avoiding sun exposure altogether
(especially between the hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.).
August 2002 Update
Back to Top
No link found
between prostate cancer and vasectomy
Good news for the millions of men worldwide who've had vasectomies:
a new study disputes a link between this birth-control operation and
prostate cancer. Two 1990 studies that connected prostate cancer and
vasectomies caused men to question the procedure, even though no medical
explanation for the connection could be found. Other research has both
confirmed and denied the association in the past 10 years.
But the new study, published in the June 19, 2002, Journal of the
American Medical Association, should ease men's minds. It involved
over 2,000 men of European descent living in New Zealand, the country
with the highest rate of vasectomies.
Researchers asked 953 men with prostate cancer and 1,260 who were cancer
free about their medical histories — including whether they had
had a vasectomy. It turned out that slightly fewer men with prostate
cancer had undergone the surgery, which supports claims that going under
the knife doesn't cause cancer. The same held true for the 38% of men
studied who had had the procedure more than 25 years ago, which suggests
that there are no long-term effects.
One reason why the link may have been found in earlier studies is that
men who have vasectomies generally see their urologists more often, which
may lead to more tumors being found in these men as compared to others,
the researchers said. The study also found no link between prostate cancer
and history of sexually transmitted disease, smoking, drinking alcohol,
and number of children.
Prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 198,000 Americans this year, and
it will take 31,500 lives. Although prostate cancer lags behind heart
attacks, strokes, and lung cancer as the leading cause of death in American
men, it's the disease many men fear most.
August 2002 Update
Back to Top
New Developments in Hormone Replacement Therapy
In July 2002, the government halted a major study of hormone therapy
three years early because of a slight but significant increase in the
risk of invasive breast cancer. Researchers concluded that the long-term
risks of taking hormones outweigh the benefits for a woman who still
has her uterus.
More than 16,000 women took part in the study, known as the Women's
Health Initiative, the largest to compare postmenopausal hormones with
a placebo. The therapy was a combination of estrogen and progestin (Prempro),
a treatment used by an estimated six million women to replace the declining
levels of hormones at menopause.
The study sought to determine whether this combination hormone therapy
could prevent such ailments as osteoporosis and heart disease. But while
there were small decreases in hip fractures and colorectal cancer, the
increases in breast cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and blood clots were
too unsettling.
The data suggested that for every 10,000 women on the estrogen-progestin
combination, an additional 8 will develop invasive breast cancer, when
compared with women not taking the therapy. An additional 7 will have
cardiovascular disease, 8 will have a stroke, and 8 will have blood clots
in the lungs (pulmonary embolism).
In the aftermath of the trial, it seems that many doctors will be reconsidering
prescribing estrogen and progestin. Some women may want to lower their
doses or limit the duration of the use of these combinations, while others
will elect to try other treatments to combat their hot flashes, vaginal
dryness, and other menopausal symptoms.
However, it is important for women already on hormone replacement therapy
(HRT) to know that there is no urgency to stop, and waiting until an
annual exam to discuss it with a doctor is fine. There is also no harm
in stopping immediately, if a woman is more comfortable doing so.
It's important to remember that only combination therapy appears to
have these effects. Estrogen alone taken by women who have had a hysterectomy
has not displayed such risks. A separate trial, with 10,000 women who
have had a hysterectomy randomly assigned to either estrogen or a placebo,
has not indicated an increased breast cancer risk. The trial is scheduled
to go until 2005.
The full report on the Women's Health Initiative appeared in the Journal
of the American Medical Association on July 17, 2002.
July 2002 Update
Back to Top
Drinking Tea Benefits Heart and Bones
The health benefits of drinking tea have been well publicized lately,
and recent studies point to two newly discovered advantages to consuming
this beverage. One shows that drinking tea can help prevent death after
a heart attack. The other reports that tea may increase bone mineral
density, which helps prevent fractures and osteoporosis.
In the first study, published in Circulation, researchers questioned
1,900 patients hospitalized for heart attacks about the amount of caffeinated
tea they drank in the past year. After adjusting for age, gender, and
other variables, researchers found that those who drank 14 or more cups
of tea per week were 39% less likely to die of cardiovascular disease
in the 3.8 years following their heart attack than non-tea drinkers.
Patients who consumed 114 cups of tea per week were 31% less likely
to die from cardiovascular causes during that period than non-tea drinkers.
When researchers further looked into subjects' caffeine intake, they
found that caffeine from sources other than tea did not affect death
rates.
In the second study, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine,
researchers surveyed 1,037 men and women age 30 and older about their
tea consumption. Subjects who drank tea at least once a week for the
preceding six months were labeled "habitual tea drinkers." This
group was asked about their tea-drinking history, the kind of tea they
drank, how often they drank it, and how much they drank in each sitting.
Researchers then measured the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar
spine, hip, neck, and total body of both the habitual tea drinkers and
the non-drinkers.
The researchers found that people who consumed tea regularly for more
than 10 years had the highest BMD scores compared to the other groups,
after they adjusted for sex, age, weight, and lifestyle variables that
may affect BMD. Those who drank tea regularly for the past 610
years also had significantly higher lumbar spine BMDs than the nonhabitual
tea drinkers. People who consistently drank tea for the past 15
years did not have any significant differences in BMD score compared
to the nonhabitual drinkers.
It didn't seem to matter what type of tea the person drank, and neither
did the amount of tea consumed each time. Only duration of habitual tea
consumption was an independent predictor of BMD score. Tea contains several
components, including fluoride and flavonoids, which may work separately
or in concert to maintain or restore bone density.
Although BMD score is often a good gauge of the risk of fracture from
osteoporosis, this study did not actually test the link between tea consumption
and bone fracture.
July 2002 Update
Back to Top
Aspirin and heart disease
Should you take aspirin to prevent a heart attack? According to a new
study, aspirin helps lower cardiovascular risk, but whether or not you
should take it depends on a bevy of factors.
The study, published in the May 9, 2002, issue of the New England
Journal of Medicine, analyzes the major trials on the subject.
Four out of five of the randomized trials show a reduction in cardiovascular
events (especially heart attacks) with aspirin use. (In randomized
trials, researchers randomly assign patients to one of the treatments
being tested.) But the studies' statistics vary wildly. For example,
risk reduction ranged from 4%44%, depending on the study. All
but one trial showed that aspirin use increased the risk of bleeding,
most commonly in the stomach.
Two large observational studies also showed that aspirin use decreased
coronary events in both people with and without heart disease. (In observational
studies, researchers simply monitor subjects' behaviors and health, they
do not test a specific treatment on them.) Subjects' ages had an impact
in both studies, with aspirin's benefit on the heart kicking in when
subjects hit 50 years old in one, 60 years old in the other. Other trials
have found that aspirin has the greatest effect on patients with high
risk for heart disease.
So what should you do? That depends a lot on your heart disease risk.
To calculate your risk go to this downloadable
scoring system on the National Institutes of Health Web site.
Then, if you answer yes to any of these questions, talk to your doctor
about starting aspirin therapy:
- Is your risk for heart disease 1.5% or higher per year?
- Is your risk between 0.7% and 1.4% per year? If so, and you
answer yes to one or more of the following questions, ask your doctor
about treatment:
- Are you in poor physical shape?
- Do you have diabetes or high blood pressure and damage
to your organs?
- Do you strongly want to start aspirin therapy?
But if your risk is 0.6% or lower per year, you're probably not a good
candidate for aspirin therapy. You should also avoid the therapy if you're
allergic to aspirin, prone to bleeding, or suffer from platelet disorders
or ulcers. Your own preference is another important factor in making
this decision.
Keep in mind that if you have high blood pressure, you'll need to take
extra care to control it in order to get the most benefits from aspirin.
Also, besides stomach bleeding, aspirin use may cause hemorrhagic stroke.
July 2002 Update
Back to Top
Healthy Diet
Eradicates Need for Trendy Supplements in Elderly
Magazine ads and television commercials tout dietary supplements that
claim to be a veritable fountain of youth for seniors. Images of grandparents
able to keep up with their grandkids convince older adults that shakes,
energy bars, and special vitamins will help boost energy and decrease
signs of aging.
Health experts, however, stress that a well-balanced diet rich in fruit
and vegetables is just as effective and probably safer. But many older
adults skip meals and eat small amounts of fruits and vegetables, citing
reasons ranging from rotten teeth to unhappiness with eating alone.
While doctors acknowledge that nutritional shakes and energy bars are
helpful for seniors who need to gain weight or have trouble chewing or
swallowing, those who eat a balanced diet or stay active do not need
them.
In spite of what the experts have said, the savvy advertisements are
convincing millions of seniors that they need these expensive supplements,
some of which have not even been proven safe.
Herbs are also a source of concern. Saw palmetto, an extracts made from
the fruit of the saw palmetto plant, is promoted as a treatment for an
enlarged prostate. Many people believe that herbs are natural and therefore
safe but this is not the case. In fact, as with most nonprescription
herbal products, the composition of the extract and the dosage have not
been standardized and the supplement is not regulated by the FDA. If
you decide to use saw palmetto, tell your doctor in order to alert him
or her to possible interactions between it and other medications you
may be taking.
People who are on strict diets — like those prescribed for kidney
disease, heart disease, or diabetes — must be especially wary of
adding any special supplements to their diet. Regardless of whether health
problems are present, you should always consult a physician before starting
any dietary regimen.
May 2002 Update
Back to Top
Fish for Good Health
In April, three studies delivered powerful evidence that fish is good
for you — and could even save your life. The key is omega-3 (or
n-3) fatty acids, beneficial polyunsaturated fats provided by many kinds
of fish and certain plant foods.
Researchers in the Nurses' Health Study examined 16 years of data involving
almost 85,000 women and found an association between fish intake and
a lower risk for heart disease and death. Women who ate fish just once
a week had a heart attack risk 29% lower than those who ate it less than
once a month. Women who ate fish five times a week had nearly half the
risk of death from a heart attack.
The Harvard's Physicians' Health Study, which involves more than 22,000
male doctors who initially had no heart disease, analyzed blood levels
of omega-3 fatty acids and risk for sudden cardiac death. Researchers
found that such deaths were 81% less likely in men with the highest levels
of omega-3s. Over half of such deaths occur in people without prior symptoms
of heart disease — a compelling reason for adding more fish to
your diet.
Finally, Italian researchers reported that heart attack survivors who
took fish-oil supplements had a lower risk of sudden death. This trial
studied omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin E in 11,000 men and women who
had recently suffered heart attacks. Researchers found that 1 gram of
omega-3 fatty acids daily reduced the risk for sudden coronary death
by up to 42%. This benefit apparently reflects their calming effect on
arrhythmias, potentially fatal heartbeat irregularities. Omega-3 fatty
acids may also inhibit clotting and improve blood vessel function. The
American Heart Association recommends four servings of fish per week
but doesn't endorse supplements because of too few data on the subject.
May 2002 Update
Back to Top
Asthma Education Leads to Improvement
in Children
Managing your child's asthma should include meeting with an asthma educator
a few times, according to a follow-up study. Presented at the meeting
of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, the study
reports that after attending an interactive training program three times
patients felt less worried about their asthma and had fewer asthma-induced
awakenings during the night. Both patients and their caregivers, who
also took part in the program, made better decisions about asthma care.
The 30 subjects, asthmatic children ages 6–12, underwent ACE IT!
(Asthma Care Education: Intensive Training), an interactive, small-group
education program. The sessions included a motivational talk by a teenage
athlete with asthma and a pharmacist's discussion of medications. A nurse
and asthma specialist also taught the participants about the clinical
nature of asthma, environmental controls, relaxation techniques, and
asthma action plans.
Researchers evaluated the children at the beginning and end of the training,
after six months, and again a year later. After the courses, the number
of patients reporting two or more nocturnal awakenings per month dropped
from 9 to 5, and the number of symptom-free days also improved, from
an average of 20 days per month to over 25 days per month.
The patients were more willing to use the tools available to them, such
as medications and peak flow meters, devises that asthmatics breath into
to help detect airway changes. They also worked harder to avoid things
that triggered their asthma, such as pets or dust.
The researchers plan to continue tracking these 30 children to study
the long-term effects on quality of life, morbidity, and cost of treatment.
A previous study published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical
Immunology in 2000, found that the training program was much more
effective than simply handing out educational materials.
May 2002 Update
Back to Top
Hepatitis A Vaccine is Safe and Effective
for Children
Hepatits A is a virus transmitted by contaminated food and is a common
cause of inflammation of the liver (hepatitis). This illness may be associated
with fever, yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice), loss of appetite,
nausea, vomiting, and tiredness. In many parts of the world, hepatitis
A is so common that almost every adult has been infected at some point
in his or her life. A vaccine to protect against hepatitis A infection
was licensed in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration
in 1995 for individuals 212 years of age.
A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association showed
that the hepatitis A vaccine was highly effective in preventing hepatitis
A outbreaks among a large group of children who received it. The study
also found the vaccine to be quite safe. Out of the nearly 30,000 children
who received the vaccine, no serious side effects were reported. Mild
adverse reactions were reported in a small percentage of cases, including
injection site reactions, fever, and rash.
Should your child be immunized? In the United States, there actually
are certain areas of the country with higher than average rates of hepatitis
A. Speak with your child's pediatrician because the hepatitis A vaccine
is currently recommended for:
- Children living in areas with consistently higher rates of
hepatitis A. This includes 11 states where the prevalence of hepatitis
A is greater than twice the national average: Alaska, Arizona, California,
Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah,
and Washington. (Routine vaccination can also be considered in six
states where the prevalence of the disease is less than double but
greater than the national average: Arkansas, Colorado, Texas, Missouri,
Montana, and Wyoming.)
- Children traveling to countries where the disease is highly
prevalent. This includes all countries other than Canada, Japan,
Australia, New Zealand, Scandinavia, and those in Western Europe.
- Children with chronic liver disease or blood-clotting disorders.
April 2002 Update
Back to Top
Home visitation program improve seniors' lives
Though many countries have nationalized home visitation programs for
the elderly, controversy exists over whether they actually help improve
the quality of participants' lives. A group of researchers recently analyzed
much of the published data to try to put the subject to rest, and the
news is favorable. The meta-analysis, published in the Feb. 27, 2002,
issue of the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), focused
on 18 trials that included over 13,000 participants.
As part of each program studied, elderly people received visits from
health care workers who tried to help them prevent functional impairment
and admission into nursing homes. The workers asked about health care
issues like immunization and exercise, looked for untreated health problems,
and reviewed the proper use of any medications the patient was taking.
Programs that evaluated many aspects of the senior's life (medical,
functional, psychological, social situation, safety of the home) and
included follow-up visits seem to be the most beneficial, according to
the analysis. Participants in this type of program kept their independence
the longest, remaining able to perform acts like dressing themselves
and going to the bathroom without assistance. All types of programs appear
to reduce mortality, but the older the patient, the less impact any program
has on death rates. Short-term visitation programs had no significant
effects on nursing home admissions. However, the rate of admission was
significantly lower in people whose program included nine or more visits
over a two- to three-year period.
Though the authors of the JAMA study admit that it has its limits because
the comparisons made in any meta-analysis must be confirmed by other
studies, they do believe it has important policy implications. They recommend
that countries with home visit programs in place analyze them to see
if they include the components the researchers found to be effective.
They also suggest that countries that do not have such programs, like
the United States, consider implementing them.
April 2002 Update
Back to Top
Immunizations for 2002
Vaccinations against childhood illnesses are arguably one of the most
significant medical achievements of the twentieth century. One hundred
years ago, approximately half of all children born in the United States
died before the age of 5, many of them from diseases that today can be
prevented by vaccines. With proper immunization, the number of cases
of these diseases has been reduced dramatically.
Although no new vaccines have been added to the 2002 recommended childhood
immunization schedule, this year's schedule highlights vaccines for pre-adolescents
and "catch-up" vaccines for children who have fallen behind
the currently recommended schedule.
In addition, due to unusual national shortages of the pneumococcal and
diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis vaccines, the 2002 immunization schedule
also includes a link to information from the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC), which explains the necessary modifications to the recommended
schedule for these vaccines. These vaccine shortages will hopefully only
be temporary.
Please discuss your child's immunization history with the doctor to
insure that his or her immunizations are up to date in accordance with
the current 2002 Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule, approved
annually by the CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American
Academy of Family Physicians. For additional reliable and up-to-date
information about vaccines and their importance, visit the National Immunization
Program website at http://www.cdc.gov/nip or
the American Academy of Pediatrics website at http://www.aap.org/.
April 2002 Update
Back to Top
New Cancer Prevention Guidelines
While some risk factors for developing cancer, such as family history,
can not be changed, there are ways for people to reduce their chances.
The American Cancer Society (ACS) recently released new dietary and physical
activity guidelines for cancer prevention.
One of the most basic tenets of a healthy diet is eating plenty of fruits
and vegetables. The ACS recommends eating no less than 5 servings of
a variety of fruits and vegetables every day. Many people have heard
of antioxidants but aren't sure exactly what they are or what they do.
Antioxidant nutrients (such as vitamin C, vitamin E, and carotenoids)
protect the body against the tissue damage that occurs as a result of
normal metabolism. Because such damage is associated with increased cancer
risk, the antioxidant nutrients are thought to protect against cancer.
Studies suggest that people who eat more vegetables and fruits, which
are rich sources of these antioxidants, have a lower risk for some types
of cancer, but studies of antioxidant supplements have not yet shown
a reduction in cancer risk.
Choosing whole grains over processed (refined) grains and sugars will
also help, so stick to whole grain rice, bread, pasta, and cereals. Also,
limit your red meat intake. When you do eat it, choose the way you cook
it carefully. While adequate cooking is necessary to kill harmful microorganisms
in meat, some research suggests that frying, broiling, or grilling it
at very high temperatures creates chemicals that might increase cancer
risk. Braising, steaming, and poaching meats cuts down on the production
of these chemicals.
Drinking too much alcohol is an established cause of cancers of the
mouth, throat, liver, and breast. Therefore, the ACS recommends limiting
alcoholic consumption to 2 drinks per day for men and 1 drink per day
for women.
The ACS also reminds people to remember that "low fat" or "fat
free" snacks like cakes and cookies are often high in calories.
High sugar intake can lead to obesity and elevated insulin levels, conditions
that increase cancer risk.
Physical activity is also an important component in the prevention of
cancer. Adults should engage in moderate-to-vigorous activity (walking,
leisurely bicycling, running, swimming) for 30 minutes or more at least
5 days a week.
Simple additions to your daily routine such as taking the stairs instead
of the elevator, taking 10-minute exercise breaks at work, and walking
to visit co-workers instead of emailing them are simple ways to increase
your activity level.
An unhealthy diet and lack of exercise can lead to weight gain and obesity,
conditions that are associated with developing cancers of the breast,
colon, endometrium, esophagus, gallbladder, pancreas, and kidney.
In addition to the general guidelines set forth by the ACS, there are
also answers to frequently asked questions about the rumored or theoretical
relationships between cancer and such substances as aspartame, beta-carotene,
calcium, coffee, fish oils, fluorides, folic acid, saccharin, and tea.
The ACS suggests that public, private, and community organizations create
environments that support the adoption and maintenance of these healthful
eating and physical activity behaviors. People should have access to
healthful foods in schools, at work sites, and when on daily outings
in their town or city.
For a copy of the complete set of guidelines, call the American Cancer
Society at 1-800-ACS-2345.
April 2002 Update
Back to Top
Periodontitis and Heart Disease
The question of whether gum disease is associated with heart disease
is controversial. The first research to suggest a connection, published
in 1989, found that even after controlling for such cardiovascular disease
risk factors as smoking and diabetes, heart-attack patients had significantly
worse dental health than control subjects. Since then, several studies
have also suggested a link, but the nature of the relationship is
it causative or coincidental? remains in question.
In 2001, researchers sought an answer to this question, examining data
from 4,027 people who participated in the First National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. During 17 years of
follow-up, there were 1,238 cases of heart disease, 538 of which proved
fatal. The rate of heart disease was three times higher in those with
periodontitis than in those with healthy gums.
However, the connection became less prominent once investigators adjusted
the numbers to account for other risk factors for cardiovascular disease smoking,
cholesterol levels, high blood pressure, and diabetes. After this adjustment,
the heart disease risk among people with and without chronic dental infections
was similar.
In fact, even those people who had eliminated any potential of dental
infection through extraction of all teeth didn't have a lower heart disease
risk when compared to those diagnosed with periodontitis (inflammation
of the gums). The risk of developing CHD didn't decrease over time among
those with no dental infections or increase over time among people with
periodontitis.
A higher rate of other heart-disease risk factors among people with periodontitis
might explain this relationship between gum disease and heart disease.
For example, those with periodontitis were more likely to have high blood
pressure and diabetes, and to smoke cigarettes.
These findings support the theory that the presence of periodontitis
may occur coincidentally with increased cardiovascular risk but it is
not its cause.
March 2002 Update
Back to Top
Obesity in Children is on the Rise
A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association showed
that American children are heavier now than ever before. In 1998, 12%,
21%, and 22% of Caucasion, African American, and Hispanic children, respectively,
were classified as overweight. In fact, between 1986 and 1998, the prevalence
of overweight children rose steadily among these groups.
The reason behind childhood obesity that kids are taking in more
calories than they're expending is easy to understand. But diagnosing
obesity is more complicated. It cannot be diagnosed simply by looking
at someone because ideal body images differ among individuals, and different
body shapes carry weight differently.
And changing lifestyles that create obesity may be even harder. Children
are spending more time than ever watching television, playing video games,
and surfing the Internet instead of being active. Their parents are busier
than ever, too, making it harder to cook nutritious meals.
This is all problematic, as obesity is a risk factor for many health
problems, both in childhood and later in life. Children who are overweight
are more likely to develop high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and
heart disease as adults than kids of normal weight. Long-term obesity
also increases the risk of arthritis, heart disease, diabetes, and certain
kinds of cancer.
So what can you do? First, talk with your child's doctor. Objective standards
have been developed for defining and measuring obesity. He or she will
use the body mass index (BMI), calculated from your child's weight and
height, and compare it with national growth charts.
There are also tangible things parents can do to help prevent (and treat)
obesity in their children as well as in themselves. Begin by establishing
healthier eating habits and promoting a more active lifestyle. For example,
you can plan daily family activities that involve exercise; limit television,
computer, and video game use; eat meals together as a family whenever
possible; and when eating out, choose lower fat items on the menu.
March 2002 Update
Back to Top
Birth Control Patch
The first skin patch approved for birth control by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration will be available by prescription in 2002. Ortho
Evra works by slowly releasing progestin and estrogen, the same hormones
used in birth control pills, into the bloodstream. Its efficacy lies
in the prevention of ovulation and the thickening of the cervical mucus,
which makes it harder for sperm to enter the uterus.
Ortho Evra is 99% effective in preventing pregnancy. However, the side
effects include an increased risk of blood clots, heart attack, and stroke.
This risk is even higher for cigarette smokers. In three clinical trials
involving over 3,000 women taking Ortho Evra, 5% of participants had
at least one patch that detached from their skin and 2% withdrew from
the trial due to skin irritation. Also, the patch appeared to be less
effective in women weighing more than 198 pounds.
The regimen is similar to that of birth control pills. The patch is changed
once a week for three weeks. The patch-free fourth week allows for a
menstrual period. The small (less than two square inches) and paper-thin
design makes Ortho Evra easy to hide beneath clothing. It can be applied
to the buttocks, abdomen, upper torso (front or back), and the upper
outer arm, and be worn in a different place each week.
February 2002 Update
Back to Top
Bicycle Helmets Save Lives
Although bicycling is one of the most popular sports, injuries associated
with bicycling are the leading cause of emergency room visits for children
and adolescents. Unfortunately, many of these injuries include head trauma.
Previous studies have shown helmets can sharply reduce the serious head
injuries that can occur with cycling. But the majority of children (and
their parents) still don't use helmets regularly. Why? Reasons suggested
include discomfort, lack of style, peer pressure, and not recognizing
the importance of helmets on short rides.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recently published a statement emphasizing
the importance of correct bicycle helmet use. In these recommendations,
all bicyclists (children and parents alike) should wear proper helmets
every time they ride. A helmet made after March 1999 should be used.
These newer helmets meet US Consumer Product Safety Commissions standards.
Children should be properly fitted because helmets come in several sizes.
Keep in mind that:
-
In its correct position, the helmet should sit low on the forehead
and be parallel to the ground.
-
Velcro pads should be placed in, or removed from, the inside
of the helmet as needed to make the helmet fit snugly.
-
The chinstrap should be adjusted so that no more than two fingers
can be placed between the strap and the chin.
-
The helmet should not shift or come off when the child shakes
his head.
- All helmets should be replaced every five years.
February 2002 Update
Back to Top
Advanced Macular Degeneration and Nutritional
Supplements
Nutritional supplements may help slow the progression of advanced macular
degeneration (AMD), the most common cause of vision loss in people over
age 55, a new study suggests.
The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS), reported in the October 2001 Archives
of Ophthalmology, is the largest clinical trial to have tested the
impact of nutritional supplements on AMD and cataracts. AREDS involved
nearly 5,000 women and men, ages 55-80, at 11 clinical centers nationwide.
Participants in the macular degeneration portion of the study were divided
into groups depending upon the severity of their condition. They received
one of the following daily regimens: 1) antioxidants (500 mg vitamin
C, 400 IU vitamin E, 15 mg beta-carotene), 2) zinc (80 mg, plus 2 mg
copper to prevent anemia), 3) a combination of the antioxidants and zinc,
or 4) a placebo. Participants were evaluated every six months for vision
loss and annually for retinal changes.
Over the seven-year study, combined antioxidants and zinc reduced the
risk for progression to advanced AMD by 25%, compared with placebo, among
those who already had extensive intermediate or large drusen or advanced
AMD in one eye. This treatment also reduced the AMD-related loss of visual
acuity by about 19%. Antioxidants or zinc alone reduced the risk, but
to a lesser extent. AREDS subjects with early or no AMD got no measurable
benefit from the supplements. In the companion study of cataract development,
antioxidants and zinc (separately or in combination) had no beneficial
effect.
Though participants reported no major side effects, the long-term consequences
of taking these nutrients at levels above the Recommended Dietary Allowance
(RDA), as AREDS participants did, are unknown.
January 2002 Update
Back to Top
White-Coat Hypertension
Most people feel a bit anxious during a doctor's visit. But for some
people, their anxiety causes temporary high blood pressure, detectable
during the time of the visit. Physicians have been debating whether or
not they should treat this phenomenon, referred to as "white-coat" hypertension.
Some believe the short-lived blood pressure elevation is harmless, while
others believe it should be treated like persistent high blood pressure.
In a recent study, researchers compared changes in the heart's function
and size among people with persistent, untreated high blood pressure, "white
coat" high blood pressure, and normal blood pressure. Participants
were carefully matched by age, sex, and weight, as well as in-clinic
and out-of- clinic blood pressures. Results of the study show participants
with "white coat" hypertension, when compared to participants
with normal blood pressure, had thicker walls in portions of their hearts,
increased heart mass, and alterations in the diastolic (relaxing) portion
of the heartbeat. Those people with persistent high blood pressure had
even greater changes in the heart. These findings suggest "white
coat" hypertension, while a temporary condition, may cause damage
to the heart. This study reinforces the argument for treating "white
coat" hypertension.
If you experience this condition, you should consult your doctor about
treatment options. Simple lifestyle changes may be all you need or medication
might be necessary. In any case, the possible benefits will outweigh
the risks.
January 2002 Update
Back to Top
Long or Irregular Menstrual Period and Diabetes
Risk
Women with long or highly irregular menstrual periods face twice the
risk of developing adult-onset diabetes compared with women with regular
periods, a new study suggests.
More than 100,000 women with no prior history of diabetes recorded their
menstrual cycles and were tracked for eight years as part of the Nurse's
Health Study.
One in every 95 subjects with cycles 40 days or longer developed diabetes,
while only 1 in every 297 women with cycles of 26 to 31 days did. Women
with cycles too irregular to measure also showed a significant increase
in the occurrence of diabetes. The risk was modestly greater for women
with a cycle length less than 21 days, though there were few women in
this category and the connection was only found when there was a family
history of the disease.
The link between a long menstrual cycle and diabetes was even stronger
in obese women. Oral contraception use had no effect on risk. This was
particularly interesting, because oral contraceptives may adversely affect
insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, therefore increasing the woman's
risk for diabetes.
In light of these findings, researchers suggest women with irregular
or long menstrual cycles make an extra effort to control other risk factors
for diabetes, such as excessive weight and lack of exercise.
January 2002 Update
Back to Top
Sugar and Tooth Decay
"If you eat too much candy your teeth will rot!" We've known
about the link between sugar consumption and tooth decay for centuries.
The bacteria in dental plaque feeds on sugar, and the acid produced by
the bacteria attacks the protective enamel surface of the teeth, allowing
for tooth decay to proceed. But since the advent of fluoride in water,
toothpaste, dental treatments, and even processed foods, do we still
need to restrict how much sugar we eat?
A recent review answers this question. Researchers examined the results
of 36 studies conducted in countries where fluoride exposure is widespread.
Only two of the studies showed people who consumed high amounts of sugar
had a high risk of tooth decay. The remaining studies showed only a moderate
to weak association. Does this mean we can eat all the candy we want
and not have to worry about tooth decay? Not quite. Moderation is still
key, because while the risk is much less than it was during the pre-fluoride
era, consuming sugar was still found to be a moderate to mild risk factor
for tooth decay.
If sugar has a role in tooth decay, can sugar substitutes have a role
in the prevention of tooth decay? A review of fourteen studies showed
a 30 to 60 percent decrease in the rate of tooth decay among study participants
who used sugar substitutes compared to participants using sugar. In the
studies, participants chewed gum or used toothpaste containing either
sugar or the sugar substitutes xylitol or sorbitol. Xylitol gave the
largest decrease in tooth decay. Sugar-free gums, particularly those
containing xylitol, may help prevent tooth decay by decreasing acid production
and promoting the flow of saliva to clear sugars from the mouth.
January 2002 Update
Back to Top
Vaccine safety: no link between thimerosal
and neurodevelopmental disorders
Parents should feel confident and safe when having their children immunized.
No evidence exists that proves a link between thimerosal-containing vaccines
and neurodevelopemental disorders, such as autism, attention deficit-hyperactivity
disorder, or speech and language delay. The Institute of Medicine recently
reported these findings, consistent with the recommendations of the American
Academy of Pediatrics.
Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, was used for many years
in vaccines to prevent contamination. Taking in a high dose of mercury
is toxic to the human nervous system. But because of the increasing number
of vaccines routinely recommended for infants, concern was raised in
1999 by the Food and Drug Administration that the total amount of mercury
contained in the vaccinations could be exceeding the recommended mercury
levels for infants.
Although there's no data to suggest thimerosal caused any harm, the American
Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service have requested
manufacturers remove thimerosal from vaccines. As a result, most, if
not all, childhood vaccines are now thimerosal-free.
The Institute of Medicine's recommendations emphasized the importance
and continued safety of childhood vaccination. Parents should definitely
be reassured that all routine childhood immunizations are in their children's
best interests, as they clearly have been shown to prevent potentially
life-threatening diseases.
November 2001 Update
Back to Top
Lyme Disease Update
Can antibiotics catch Lyme disease before it develops? Do antibiotics
alleviate the lingering symptoms after the infection is cured? Two recent
studies published in The New England Journal of Medicine shed
light on these two controversial questions.
In the first study, conducted in Westchester County, New York, an area
with high rates of Lyme disease, researchers gave a single dose of either
an antibiotic or a placebo to patients who were bitten by deer ticks
in the previous 72 hours.
The researchers found the antibiotic doxycycline prevented the disease
form developing. However, only 3.2% of the untreated patients developed
the characteristic bull's eye rash around the tick bite. This suggests
the risk of Lyme disease is low even in Westchester County. The study
also found the infection was more likely to develop from bites by ticks
in the nymph stage, and if the tick was attached for 72 hours or more.
This study suggests preventive treatment is only worthwhile in areas
with a particularly high incidence of the disease or if you are bitten
by a nymphal deer tick that has been attached for three days or more.
You should save the tick in a jar of alcohol so it may be identified
to help you and your physician make that decision.
In the second study, researchers investigated whether prolonged treatment
with antibiotics reduces the fatigue, muscle and joint pain, and mood
or memory disturbances that some people experience even after the infection
has cleared. But the study was discontinued early when preliminary results
showed prolonged antibiotic treatment was no more effective than a placebo
at improving the persistent symptoms.
If you are experiencing post-Lyme disease symptoms, long-term use of
antibiotics is unlikely to help. But there is hope your condition will
improve the study found symptoms improved in 36% of the untreated
patients.
September 2001 Update
Back to Top
Flu Vaccine and Recurrent Heart Attack
Risk
Late each fall, the call goes out to remind people to get their flu
vaccinations. Most healthy people equate the flu with a week of being
miserable. However for the elderly or people with chronic illnesses,
the complications of influenza, such as pneumonia, can be life threatening.
Good enough reason to get the shot, but now research suggests the vaccination
may also lower heart attack risk.
The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Texas-Houston,
questioned whether getting a flu shot could reduce the risk of a second
heart attack in people with coronary artery disease. Scientists have
been studying a potential link between cardiovascular disease and infection,
and some of their work suggests upper respiratory infections, such as
the flu, might be a risk factor for heart attack.
The investigators evaluated 218 individuals with previous heart attacks
who were seen in the university's cardiology outpatient clinic during
the 1997-98 flu season. Of the patients who met the study criteria, 109
experienced a heart attack during the study period. These volunteers
were matched with 109 controls with coronary artery disease, but had
not experienced a second heart attack during the same period.
Of those who had had new myocardial infarctions, the rate of flu vaccination
during the current season was 47%, versus 71% among those who did not
have new heart attacks. After adjusting for differences between these
groups, the researchers found the risk of heart attack was reduced by
two-thirds among patients who had gotten a flu shot that season. This
study showed no evidence that use of multivitamins or physical exercise
changed risk for recurrent heart attack.
No one knows how flu vaccination might reduce a person's risk of heart
attack. Perhaps exposure to the flu might cause atherosclerotic plaques
to become less stable or the stress of this illness might dangerously
increase the heart's workload for people with cardiovascular disease.
Other theories include an increased tendency for blood clots during the
flu or that the flu may contribute to poor blood vessel function. Whatever
the cause and effect, people with coronary artery disease (and who are
not allergic to the vaccine) should strongly consider getting a flu shot
this season.
September 2001 Update
Back to Top
Take Low-Dose Aspirin and Skip Vitamin
E to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease
For more than 100 years aspirin has helped relieve headaches and other
pain, and now new evidence from the Primary Prevention Project backs
the claim it also helps prevent heart attacks and other cardiovascular
events. The same study also found the antioxidant vitamin E didn't help.
The theory that anti-platelet/anti-inflammatory drugs like aspirin and
antioxidant nutrients like vitamin E might interfere with atherosclerosis
and prevent cardiovascular disease is not new. But previous research
on both possibilities has come up with mixed results. In an attempt to
resolve the debates, Italian researchers randomized 4,495 people (2583
females and 1912 men) with an average age of 64.4 to receive low-dose
aspirin (100mg/day) or no aspirin and vitamin E supplements (300mg/day)
or no vitamin E. They limited their investigation to people over 50 with
one or more of the major cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, high
blood cholesterol, diabetes, obesity, family history of early heart attacks
or individuals who were elderly.
Aspirin proved to be beneficial with respect to all of the criteria measured.
It reduced the risk of a cardiovascular death by 44% and the risk of
cardiovascular events or disease by 23%. However, severe gastrointestinal
bleeding was more frequent in the aspirin group than in the non-aspirin
group (1.1% vs 0.3%). Consistent with the negative results of other large
published trials, vitamin E provided no significant improvements in any
of the criteria.
The study was stopped prematurely after a mean follow-up of 3.6 years
because evidence from two other studies involving a total of 24,289 patients
concurred that aspirin is beneficial in primary prevention.
August 2001 Update
Back to Top
Early Childcare and Communicable Illnesses
All kids get sick, but young children in day care are at increased risk
for infection.
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development recently
examined rates of ear infections, gastrointestinal tract illnesses, and
upper respiratory tract infections in children participating in the Institute's
Study of Early Child Care. The study is following 1200 children from
birth to age three in ten locations across the county. The researchers
found the rates for each illness were higher for children in day care
than for those reared exclusively at home during the first two years
of life. But this difference disappeared by the time they were three
years old.
The number of hours per week children spent in day care generally had
little to do with their likelihood of getting sick. Instead, the great
the number of children enrolled in a facility, the greater a child's
risk of illness. But being sick more frequently didn't have developmental
consequences. Some parents felt that sickly children had increased behavioral
problems, but this was likely the result of increased stress.
July 2001 Update
Back to Top
Walk, Don't Run for Weight Loss
People often disrupt their sedentary lifestyles with bouts of high-intensity
exercise, like running or aerobics, to avoid gaining weight or developing
heart disease. But a new study shows spending some of your day engaged
in moderate activity, like biking, walking, or even taking the stairs
at work, may be more a successful method for boosting daily calorie expenditure
and losing weight.
The study, published in Nature, involved 30 healthy, non-obese
women and men. For two weeks, the participants energy expenditure
was measured, while their activity levels were tracked using portable
motion sensors and activity diaries. The investigator found the amount
of moderate activity, not vigorous exercise, was a significant predictor
of total energy expenditure. He hypothesized that moderate activity usually
occupies a larger portion of the day compared to more vigorous exercise.
For instance, studies on obese subjects have found adding intense exercise
to diet didnt enhance weight loss because the extra energy expenditure
didnt offset the reduced time spent on other physical activities.
This small, but informative study provides strong evidence that exchanging
some of time you sit in front of a TV for moderate activity increases
total daily energy expenditure and metabolic rate. Short bursts of vigorous
activity in an otherwise inactive and unhealthy lifestyle is not enough.
So take the stairs, not the elevator, and go for a walk at lunch. But
dont be discouraged from going for a run. Aerobic activities, like
jogging, swimming and brisk walking, help make your heart stronger and
more efficient, which can lower your heart disease risk still further.
June 2001 Update
Back to Top
National Cholesterol Education Program Releases
New Guidelines for Treating and Preventing High Cholesterol
On May 15, 2001, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) coordinated
by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) released
the first major revision of its recommendations for detecting and lowering
high cholesterol in adults since 1993.
One of the fundamental features of the new guidelines is the accurate
assessment of heart disease risk using a new "global risk assessment
tool" that combines multiple risk factors into a measure of a person's
absolute risk of developing coronary heart disease within the next 10
years. According to the guidelines, patients who have a risk of 20% or
higher should receive aggressive therapy to control cholesterol levels.
In addition to aggressive treatment of high LDL cholesterol, as laid
out in the 1993 report, the revised guidelines also recommend a more
assertive treatment approach for diabetes, low HDL levels, and high triglyceride
levels.
Specific changes include:
- Treating high cholesterol more aggressively for those with
diabetes, even if they do not have heart disease.
- A full lipid profile (which measures total cholesterol,
LDL, HDL, and triglycerides) as the first test for high cholesterol
(rather than simply testing total cholesterol and HDL and performing
a full lipid profile only if total cholesterol is high).
- A new level at which low HDL becomes a major risk factor
for heart disease. The 1993 guidelines defined a low HDL as less
than 35 mg/dL; now it is less than 40 mg/dL.
- More aggressive treatment of high triglyceride levels.
- Advising against the hormone replacement therapy (HRT) as
an alternative to cholesterol-lowering drugs for post-menopausal
women.
Another key change in the guidelines is intensified lifestyle recommendations
regarding nutrition, exercise, and weight control to treat high cholesterol.
The updated diet advises that less than 7% of daily calories come from
saturated fat and limits dietary cholesterol to less than 200 mg per
day. It also allows up to 35% of daily calories from total fat, provided
most come from unsaturated or monounsaturated fat, which doesn't raise
cholesterol levels. Additionally, the guidelines strongly underscore
the need for weight control and physical activity, both of which improve
various heart disease risk factors.
The revised recommendations also emphasize careful attention to the metabolic
syndrome, a particular cluster of cardiovascular risk factors that
is becoming increasingly common in the United States. Characteristics
of metabolic syndrome include too much abdominal fat, high blood pressure,
high blood sugar, elevated triglycerides, and low HDL.
For more information, see the "Live Healthier, Live Longer" Web
site by going to the NHLBI home page at www.nhlbi.nih.gov and
clicking on ATP III Cholesterol Guidelines under Highlights.
| 2001 Cholesterol Guidelines |
| Total Cholesterol Level |
Total Cholesterol Category |
| Less than 200 mg/dL |
Desirable |
| 200-239 mg/dL |
Borderline High |
| 240 mg/dL and above |
High |
| LDL Cholesterol Level |
LDL Cholesterol Category |
Less than 100 mg/dL
|
Optimal |
| 100-129 mg/dL |
Near optimal/above optimal |
| 130-159 mg/dL |
Borderline high |
| 160-189 mg/dL |
High |
| 190 mg/dL and above |
Very high |
Trigylceride Level
|
Triglyceride Category |
| Less than 150 mg/dL |
Normal |
| 150-199 mg/dL |
Borderline high |
| 200-499 |
High |
| Greater than or equal to 500 |
Very high |
| HDL Cholesterol Level |
HDL Cholesterol Category |
| Less than 40 mg/dL |
Low (representing increased risk) |
| 60 mg/dL and above |
High (heart protective) |
|
Three Categories of Risk that Modify
LDL Cholesterol Goals |
Risk Category |
LDL Goal (mg/dL) |
| Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) and CHD equivalents |
Less than 100 |
| Multiple (2+) risk factors |
Less than 130 |
| 0-1 risk factor |
Less than 160 |
|
| Risk factors (exclusive of LDL cholesterol): cigarette smoking;
blood pressure greater than or equal to 140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive
medication; HDL cholesterol less than 40 mg/dL; a family history
of coronary heart disease before age 55 in a father or brother
or age 65 in a mother or sister; age above 45 for men and 55 for
women |
May 2001 Update
Back to Top
Study Shows Fish Consumption Protects Against Stroke,
But FDA Suggests Pregnant Women Should Take Caution
A large study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
recently showed that regularly eating fish might protect against ischemic
stroke, which is the most common type of stroke. Numerous studies have
already shown an association between fish consumption and a reduced risk
of heart disease. But there is a caveat. The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) recently warned that pregnant women and women who are of childbearing
age who may become pregnant, should avoid certain types of fish that
contain high levels of mercury, which may be harmful to their unborn
children.
Results of the Nurses' Health Study, published in the JAMA article,
involved nearly 80,000 women. It showed that women who ate fish two to
four times a week had a 48% lower risk of ischemic stroke the
kind caused by blood clots than women who ate fish less than once
per month. Even women who ate fish only once a week or less had a risk
reduction, but it was not statistically significant. These results held
true primarily among women who did not regularly take aspirin, which
prevents the formation of blood clots. Omega-3 fatty acids, the protective
substances found in fish, reduce levels of fats related to cardiovascular
disease and help prevent blood clotting. Dark, oily fish such as mackerel,
salmon, and sardines are a good source of omega-3 fatty acids.
Although pregnant women need not give up fish and its beneficial
health effects altogether, they should be careful about what types
of fish they eat. The FDA has advised that pregnant women and those who
may become pregnant stop eating shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and
tilefish. These large, long-living fish contain hazardous levels of methyl
mercury, a form of mercury that can accumulate in a woman's body
and affect the developing central nervous system of an unborn child.
This can lead to babies with slower cognitive development. As an extra
precaution, the FDA advised that nursing mothers and young children also
avoid these fish. Mercury gets into both fresh and salt water through
industrial pollution.
Some critics feel the FDA's mercury warnings are not strong enough. A
report by the National Academy of Sciences suggested the exposure limits
for mercury should be four times stricter.
While this controversy remains unresolved, the FDA encouraged pregnant
women to continue to eat a variety of other fish, containing very low
levels of mercury, as part of a balanced diet. Among other health benefits,
the fatty acids in fish enhance brain development. According to the FDA,
women can safely eat up to 12 ounces of fish per week. Fish that contain
low levels of mercury include shellfish, canned fish, smaller ocean fish,
and farm-raised fish. Women who eat fish caught by family or friends
should contact their local health department for advice on the safety
of fish from local waters.
May 2001 Update
Back to Top
Reducing Your Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis During
Airline Travel
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), recently featured in the news as "economy
class syndrome," is the formation of a blood clot in the deep veins
of the legs while sitting particularly in the cramped seats of
an airplane (be it economy class or first class), car, bus, or train for
long periods. You move less in tight quarters, causing circulation to
decrease and allowing blood to collect and form a clot. The blood clot
may cause pain and swelling in the legs. Serious, even fatal complications
can occur if the blood clot breaks loose in the blood stream and travels
to the heart or lungs. Older people, and those who are obese or have
a family history of DVT tend to be at the highest risk.
While a blood clot can result from a number of causes, some studies suggest
an association between blood clots and airplane travel. Many doctors
believe this connection is simply a result of being unable to move around,
and not from sitting in economy class seats or in an airplane, per
se. However, it is possible that pressurized air and dehydration
may also play a role in the connection between air travel and blood clots.
Many airlines have already begun to address this health issue by preparing
warning pamphlets for their passengers, including articles in their in-flight
magazines, posting notices on their Websites, or creating in-flight videos
offering exercises aimed at prevention. A member of the parliament in
Australia has even called for treadmills to be installed in airplanes
that carry passengers for six or more hours.
While treadmills may or may not appear on airplanes in the near future,
you can address this issue on your next lengthy flight by taking a few
simple measures to help prevent blood clotting.
- Wear loose-fitting, comfortable clothing during the flight.
- Eat a small meal and drink plenty of fluids to help increase
blood circulation. Avoid alcohol and caffeine, as these contribute
to dehydration.
- Do not cross your legs while seated and make sure you adjust
your position every half hour.
- You may want to wear elastic support hose to increase circulation
in your legs.
- Most importantly, try to walk up and down the aisle at least
once an hour. Even standing in front of your seat and gently shaking
out your legs or slowly rising up on your toes can help.
- If you cant get out of your seat, you can do the following
exercises in your seat to increase blood circulation. Perform each
exercise for 15 seconds, once an hour.
- Ankle rotations: Draw a circle with your toes, rotating clockwise
and then counterclockwise with both feet.
- Foot pumps: Slowly alternate between flexing and pointing
your toes.
- Leg lifts: With your knee bent, lift your leg up off the
seat and hold for a few seconds. Alternate legs.
- Head and shoulder rotations: Gently roll your head clockwise
and then counterclockwise, keeping your shoulders relaxed. Then gently
roll your shoulders forwards and backwards.
- Toe reach: Slowly bend forward and extend your arms down
towards your toes and then gently sit back up.
- People who are at high risk for blood clotting due to other
conditions should speak with their physician for additional advice
before traveling.
Studies do not agree on how long a flight needs to be to pose a risk
of blood clotting. A few studies even suggest that there is no association
between blood clots and air travel. Clearly, more research is necessary.
However, while we wait for a definitive answer to these questions, heeding
these simple instructions may help prevent problems.
March 2001 Update
Back to Top
Pet Reptiles and Salmonella
Between 1996 and 1998, approximately 16 state health departments reported
salmonella infections in persons who had direct or indirect contact with
reptiles (i.e., lizards, snakes, or turtles) to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
Salmonella infection can result in severe illness and even death, particularly
in infants, young children, and anyone with a compromised immune system.
The CDC issued the following recommendations to reduce the chances of
anyone in your family contracting this potentially deadly infection from
these increasingly popular exotic pets:
- Pet store owners, veterinarians, and pediatricians should
provide information to owners and potential purchasers of reptiles
about the risk of acquiring salmonellosis from reptiles.
- People should always wash their hands thoroughly with soap
and water after handling reptiles or reptile cages.
- People at increased risk for infection or serious complications
of salmonellosis (e.g., children younger than age 5 and immunocompromised
persons) should avoid contact with reptiles.
- Pet reptiles should be kept out of households where children
younger than age 5 and immunocompromised persons live. Families expecting
a new child should remove the pet reptile from the home before the
infant arrives.
- Pet reptiles should not be kept in childcare centers.
- Pet reptiles should not be allowed to roam freely throughout
the home or living area.
- Pet reptiles should be kept out of kitchens and other food-preparation
areas to prevent contamination.
- Kitchen sinks should not be used to bathe reptiles or to
wash their dishes, cages, or aquariums. If bathtubs are used for
these purposes, they should be cleaned thoroughly and disinfected
with bleach.
Back to Top
Starve a Cold, Feed a Fever, Take a Pill for the
Flu?
The height of the flu season is starting to wane, but we seem to be
at the peak of print and television ads promoting new treatments. Late
in 1999, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two new anti-influenzal
drugs zanamivir (Relenza) and oseltamivir (Tamiflu). Both work by interfering
with an enzyme needed for the flu virus to reproduce. Both offer an option
for treating uncomplicated cases of the flu.
In clinical trials, when taken within two days of the onset of flu symptoms,
Relenza was shown to make people feel better a little (about 36 hours)
sooner. This drug is administered in an inhaler twice daily for five
days. Relenza has not been proved effective for people who have severe
asthma or chronic breathing problems, and in fact may cause bronchial
spasms in these individuals. Tamiflu comes in pill form (taken twice
a day for five days) and can reduce the length and severity of flu symptoms
if it is taken within two days of the onset of symptoms, but not by much.
Patients participating in two clinical trials reported feeling better
about one day sooner than patients taking a placebo. The most common
side effects of Tamiflu included upset stomach, vomiting, trouble sleeping,
and dizziness. Neither drug can prevent people from passing the flu on
to others. These medications may offer some relief to flu sufferers,
but getting a flu vaccine remains the best way to minimize your chances
of getting this virus in the first place. This is true for healthy people
and especially for people at high risk for complications from the flu
(the elderly and people with compromised immune systems or chronic lung
diseases).
In fact, the safety and effectiveness of these new flu treatments are
unproven in these populations. What's more, Tamiflu and Relenza are effective
only against influenza types A and B, but not type C (a very common,
less severe flu) and many upper respiratory infections caught during
the winter are viral, and not the flu.
The bottom line is that these medications are helpful in only a handful
of situations. An extra day of fluids and bed rest may be all you can
do.
Back to Top
|